Photoshop :3

Uhhh CAD did do some halo 3 odst things...

take the cmt rips troll post that spammers use and replace cmt with zteam and put they don't release at the end and you got zteam after z sanctuary in a nut shell

i dont get why zteam never releases its stuff. whats the point of ripping it when you have no one to enjoy it with

the h3 stuff will be released in the pit,penguin just has to do his part.

penguins waddle so there slow so is penguin :/

They have eachother, and the fun part is doing to work to get it ingame and looking good. The map being done is boring. :p
Edited by Invader Veex on Aug 5, 2010 at 05:20 PM

I'm planning to go to Gamestop tonight to check out the new footage of Halo Reach.

http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&link=BWU_080610

Wow. I had a 25% chance in winning the legendary edition and I lost. Meh, at least there is still the possibility of winning the life size Spartan set. As for the footage that they shown tonight, it was mostly old and wasn't worth seeing.

ya i knew it was going to be old thats why i didnt go

friggin epic

LOL could use as a substitute vehicle for teh worthawg run.

no.. the mongoose cant make some of the jumps in warthog run -_-

imagine the forklift
Edited by Hydrogen on Aug 7, 2010 at 12:24 AM

...................................give it rocket propulsion?

Forklift with rocket propulsion? Add in some NOS would you? oh and the fork like the energy blade 'o' doom. Then it would be fit for the hog run.

f that, i wanna see a covie styled forklift. would prob look something like the Ghost

The Covenant have anti-gravity on demand, they don't need forklifts. Also, everything is almost weightless in microgravity.

i made it through the whole level with the mongoose, dun know what your talking about. Its just when going down a slope, the warthog will inevitably go faster than any other vehicle.

EDIT: urk says it's fake. So never mind.
Edited by Karrde on Aug 10, 2010 at 09:17 PM

^ If someone marks a link with spoiler, don't go displaying images from it!

Anyway, looks and sounds really fake.

Really, the reticles in Reach are drastically different from those in the past 3/4 (if you want to count ODST) games. I doubt they'd reuse one, the tank, for something so different and new.

too long, did not read

Looks real to me.

Who knows if the plot is correct. But that image was fake.

How could it be fake? Looks real enough for me.

Look at how damn low res it is and just how terrible everything looked.

And Bungie may have been known for shamelessly reusing animations (at least in the beta, I'm pretty sure most everything is completely made now :D) but reusing something like that from Halo 1 just seems very unlikely.

Halo reach uses all motion capture and animators tweaking them as they go. And maybe doing a few animations that are impossible to be motion capped. But pretty much all humanoid animations are mo-capped.

vid or stfu. leave it at that.

When the hell is everyone going to realize that most of the time when I say "animations" I'm talking about the first person animations?

They are not mo-capped. I don't think any game has their first person animations mo-capped.

They do, and lots of games have FP mo-capped. Mirror's edge, cod, stalker, bad company. Etc etc.

No, Reach does not have motion-captured first person animatons ffs.

What's your proof for the bolded ones, too? I'm not really too sure about Mirror's edge, it could very well be animated by hand though I'm not sure because the legs do look suspiciously realistic.

Call of Duty: OK, IMBrokeRU can easily replicate their animations, even a bit better than them and he's not even a professional. It's very likely they animate by hand in Maya. World at War, I know is not mo-capped first person either, nor are any of the other CoDs.

Stalker: I just searched a gameplay video of this. HELL. NO. I saw an origin and cried, saw a reload and cried. Definitely not mo-capped >_>

Bad Company: Doubting this one too, unless they're just SEVERELY edited by an animator (or more) to have that unique look and feel they have.

COD MW2 is mo-cap.
Prove me wrong.

Bad Company is mo-cap along with a procedural animation system.

And yea stalker does not use mo-cap.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtKN7TJkLpU

This is a 16 (maybe 17 now) year old. He is experienced perhaps up to 2-3 years. Look at what he can do. (Seriously, look at some of his other uploads. Those animations there are actually pretty old)
I'm pretty damn sure, an IW employee, a professional, who went to school for it+other things/etc etc, is very much capable of the same thing and much much more.
It's not mo-cap. The animations are clearly stylized, far too loose, and some movement are unrealistic in ways. Again, it's not very hard to make something such as they have... though me and my style would probably have it turn out a bit different.


Stop underestimating us.

You have failed to prove me wrong again.
I ask you to prove me wrong and you advertise to me about some 16/17 year old that can do animations. Mo-cap is less expensive so even if they provide an even quality, I am sure they would go for mo-cap rather than paying an animator constantly. I am sure they would have some kind of animator that knows the bar bones enough to do some of the cinematic movements, such as jumping out of a 4 story building and the such.



Bad Company 2 uses a procedural animation system when also transitions between one animation to another in real-time. The loose feeling is probably from this since you never really see any shaky movements from the hands or most humanoid animations. Crysis had this effect as well since it relies on its animation interpolation and combining to do "realism".