I noticed that somewhat and hope they're placeholders, as they still have quite a while to make them.

Then again...most developers would have them done by now.

You guys are being stupid. The art in it looks awesome and the foliage also looks awesome. It's Halo 1 with improved graphics. You have seen one video, looks amazing to me.

Just looking at that trailer is truly truly special. Just looking at our baby blooming into her true beauty. It just makes you smile and remember all of the old memories hanging out with her.

Thank You So Much 343
Xoronatus



Edited by Xoronatus on Jun 6, 2011 at 07:09 PM

I feel like I'm one of the few that actually likes this idea. Isn't this what people have wanted for years?

Well yeah, watching it again, eh, halo 1 animations, ugly assault rifle, ugly spartan model. But when you look at the textures, they just look so gorgeous.

A Combat Evolved remake?

The helmet on the cheif looks like some body made it with no refs to the original, and looks like total ass, along with the visor.

Y'all so mad

I'm gonna buy this and enjoy it and not be a bungie dicksucking fantard who thinks no other company can make good games.. they cant f it up like bungie did h2 and 3

Y'all soooo mad
Edited by HaloIsAHorribleGane on Jun 6, 2011 at 08:13 PM

For those of you screaming about there not being a PC port, keep in mind Halo PC didn't come out until 2003. They could still have a port to PC for HPC's anniversary. Just a thought though.

Halo PC didn't have the kind of impact that the console version did, mainly because the PC had tons of great fps games before Halo. Which is probably why an anniversary edition of the pc version is unlikely.

k, I will, thanks :)


I like how (aside from disliking Halo 2) the guy with the username "HaloIsAHorribleGane" is the one who shares my opinion on this.

I actually think the Halo remake looks amazing. It keeps the old good feel of classic Halo: CE, and that game was the best when it first came out. It'll be nice to go back to it again, with improved graphics as well.

i wanted new animations not those ugly pistol and assault rifle animations.

Admittedly 2 was enjoyable. A step in the wrong direction but enjoyqble

3 was a dive in the wrong direction

Reach was fun.. so was odst

Speaking of Assault Rifles, I liked the Halo 3 Model better than the Reach one... as for the one in the trailer, I think that the Assault Rifle is messed up, same with the FOV on the weapons too, its...... too "stretched"

18:48] azjesse: Halo 4 was announced?
[18:48] azjesse: BS
[18:48] azjesse: master queef is dead
[18:48] azjesse: well, figuratively, and in the game :P
[18:57] clusterfoxtrot: yeah
[18:57] azjesse: just saw a vid
[18:57] azjesse: tbh
[18:57] azjesse: looks like a good cmt mod
[18:57] clusterfoxtrot: kinda disappointed
[18:57] clusterfoxtrot: though
[18:57] azjesse: by that I mean
[18:57] azjesse: it looks like a good cmt mod
[18:57] azjesse: lol

You guys do realize they said at the touch of a button you can play the original version of the game at any time, right?

Man you all are so bitter.

they prolly just mad there's no bungie

All those whining, quit crying like a female dog.

Obviously most of you are mad, go send a letter to 343i. Me and Gane will enjoy playing while all of you will get mad and whine like no other.

Get over the fact it has its errors. It's what makes it so much more fun, to see people get mad and to show that no game is perfect. Perfection is a myth anyways, no such thing.

Actually, I enjoy a good game regardless of graphics/story or w/e. It's just personal preference for me. If they want the FOV that way, I'm fine with it. :) But then again, you are right my friend, I am a little bit disappointed that Halo is handed off to 343...

A good CMT mod? :S You people know nothing...

Btw guyz, guyz, they didnt curl the elite fingers

:>

and chiefs fingers to they didnt curl, I love this game!
Edited by Spartan_094 on Jun 6, 2011 at 11:46 PM

BAD AMINATIONS??

I SHALL NOT MAKE THIS PURCHASE

How I felt about Microsoft's E3 conference.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPjUO2YSjn0

We all know the PS3 has no games little boy.

Console peasants getting mad that they have rehashes.

I plan to enjoy my rehash and play in classic mode.

Terrible troll l28.

I think it's a legitimate point of criticism. It demonstrates an unsettling lack of care or effort on the part of the developers that makes the use of Reach's art assets look fairly half-hearted. Yes, they may (and by God I hope they do) fix the models in third-person and curl the bipeds' fingers (among other things), but given the emphasis they're placing on "everything is the same" I'm not sure how they'll go about fixing some of the less-appealing effects of using those models with the Halo 1 FP animations.

I'm going to be looking at them for the entirety of the game that isn't cutscenes. If I'm constantly presented with glaring issues regarding integration of new assets with the old experience, then no - I don't think I will be making this purchase. If I'm going to be paying for a high-definition visual makeover of the game, I will expect there to be evidence of significant effort on the part of the developers to make sure that the new content is well integrated with the old. If the game has "BAD AMINATIONS" as has been demonstrated, I'd say that they haven't succeeded on that front, and I don't want to pay for a game I've already played dozens of times with a questionably well-done makeover.
Edited by teh lag on Jun 7, 2011 at 12:19 AM

I'm curious as to what the flood will look like.

me to

trust me, I'm passionate about animation, and giving life through movement. but, call me old fassioned, I believe graphics aren't everything. back in the days of the nintendo I didn't give a crap how horrid the graphics looked, the gameplay is what sold me.

minecraft looks like crap, but has been remarkably successful. is it pretty to look at? no. so, given the "glaring issues" with the graphics, why does it do so well? it's definitely not the blocks of 8x8-pixil textures. it's the freedom the player is given to do whatever the hell they want... something you don't see very often in the game industry these days.

to this day, I play retro games. I'm sick of developers trying to make everything look pretty, while making the gameplay and story bland and unexciting. these days, everything is way too polished, everything feels forced, I.E. the developers holding my hand and leading me as opposed to giving me the freedom to find my own way. it seems developers these days want players to mindlessly be in awe at the graphics of the game, and mindlessly navigate through levels. it sickens me, there is no passion. it's a business.

Alexander Brandon, videogame composer, said it the best: technical limitations are a good thing.

I will be buying this game, not for the graphics, and not even the achievements (achievement whores are laughable), but for the online multiplayer and improved netcode; what halo should have had back in the day. I doubt I will be spending much time in the campaign. or even on the new graphic settings during multiplayer, it would be way too visually distracting.

Master chief is fugly. (Visor is bland)
The game better be converted to PC, or else, I'm sticking with this game. (Mostly because I don't have an Xbox360, and don't intend to get one.)
Same gameplay, same BSP, just a graphical revamp? *sigh*

I'm one of 'em.