yes because halo pc was influenced by halo 1 xbox. If it wasn't a big deal, then there would have probably not been a halo pc/ce

What I mean though is that Halo PC wasn't given high review scores and game of the year awards like halo 1 xbox was.

These weapons look like total crap. Using the reach weapons would be way better than using these replacements. I hope they aren't final.
Edited by Invader Veex on Jul 19, 2011 at 05:03 PM

It seems like their main concerns were just getting the environmental changes done, and now they're probably working on the finer details like weapons and bipeds.

Oh my god... the origin is HORRIBLE

Your wrong. And I ripped all the models for Spartan, then later gave him the extractor, I would know myself, that, that is the 3p. line the edges in paint, and it matches a wireframe...

All I am known for it rips, and believe me I know the models when I see them...

EDIT:

Glad to see your coming to your sense, you admit making "small amount from yourself" or you don't want to spread your stupidity infront of a well-respected member such as ODX. smh -_-


To Hobble...

Edited by iHalo on Jul 19, 2011 at 07:25 PM
Edited by iHalo on Jul 19, 2011 at 07:26 PM
Edited by iHalo on Dec 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM
Edited by iHalo on Jul 19, 2011 at 07:28 PM

Okay so part of my statement was wrong, but my main point was that he's seen lots of Halo 3's content. Particularly, the weapons both FP and 3P.

Let me settle this. The texture on that AR definitely matches the Halo 3 AR textures. UVs are the same, so by using simple logic we can conclude that the model used is in fact, the Halo 3 model, whether it's the 3P or a butchered FP can be fought out amongst yourselves. Alternatively you could argue the only remaining feasible possibility that a new model was created and then unwrapped to fit an already existing texture. Game companies would totally waste their time like that right? Try matching the scratches on the models, you will see that I am right. As for the different numbers plate screen, you can see that the "texture" of the screen was edited to not touch the edges on the bottom left and right sides of the screen which explains the difference. Why bother arguing with all of this anyway?

Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was stating that Bobblehob was wrong, not you..



Honestly? I have a giant-ass ego.
Edited by iHalo on Jul 19, 2011 at 08:05 PM

You were pretty much right anyway.

I couldn't quite hear you bobble. I didn't seem to catch what you just said
Edited by Spartan_094 on Jul 19, 2011 at 08:15 PM

If you missed it


Hmmm

Lol, nice pwn. But damn the origins in this CEA suck haha

Just post the pictures first next time :P

@Ihalo, I know I was wrong, I wasn't referring to 94 in my second post, the one that you quoted.

I'm going to guess that, as I said before, they're still focusing on touching up the BSP and have only now just gotten to messing around with the weapons.

Actually, I'm sure they were just using that Halo 3 AR as a placeholder in the level and haven't changed it yet compared to other map builds that are using Reach assets.

Again, as placeholders until they actually get to them.

now remind me why we need 343 to make a version of halo anniversary for the pc?


I dont know about ya'll, but I just pre-ordered this game :p

Needs more release.

I WANT that SKULL

The models look a tab bit alike. Halo:CEA will be a fun experience to those who love Halo 1 on the console. No reason this should even be on a Halo 1 PC/CE forum. Has nothing to do with it, this is CE discussion. Why discuss Xbox on a PC forum? And to those 'haters' of the models and animations, if you listen to the commentary videos or those from SDCC, they always tell you this is alpha/beta stages. Everything changes, and more than likely it will change again, to what the community likes. It's also the same reason on why they replaced the pistol and AR model, the COMMUNITY, asked them to. They were in for testing and will be tweaked or fully replaced to fit what the community wants, and what best goes with the original game.

And for multiplayer, you do not need to own Reach for it. It comes with the multiplayer built in. Yes it uses Reach's engine, but that's because they didn't want to separate the two games and communities away from one another. Even if you do not buy Halo:CEA, you can later download the maps in a map pack just for Reach. They are also creating a playlist specifically for the maps, it will be pure classic mode and change up the game play, as if it wasn't even like you were playing Reach. It's going to be a big title update, they will also be adding something else too, but I'm unsure of what it might be.

The End of this post.
Edited by Etrusion on Jul 26, 2011 at 04:10 PM

lolbump?
Edited by bigfoot343 on Jul 26, 2011 at 04:25 PM

If I may:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1PkUrEggu4

I noticed no one ever posted this.

HOLY *CENSORED* MORE CENSORED* ***************,
THE UI. Someone needs to remake that.

Halo model is ugly.

Also, anyone here the new theme? I personally don't think it's anything special, it just seems like the original, but sped up.
Edited by Sergeant 1337 on Jul 27, 2011 at 12:08 AM

If there's one thing I want changed/updated, it's the physics. I want to be able to move around in a moving vehicle, and do all that stuff.

Ok, so people saying it's not worth it, you realize that.
$40 worth of Microsoft points is about 2500 points
reach multiplayer map packs 800 points each
That's 3 maps for 800 points
so with 7 in the game, that's 1600 points and a free map.
Which equals roughly to about.... 900 points for the rest of the game.
which equals about 10-12 dollars

Yay logic!

You forgot to mention that halo reach multiplayer map packs are NOT WORTH 800 msp

ummm...youre way off lol

So you would pay $40 for a rehash?

They were willing to pay $60 for Halo 3 weren't they?

Halo 3 is basically it's own game (even though H2 was better IMO).

I would not pay more than 20$ for this new CE because even though as ODX said, they re-did everything including the game engine, they still only EDITED the game and haven't created new levels, encounters, weapon concepts or any of those things. It's still a mod and I doubt any mod should be worth more than the game. As far as I am concerned, this is still Halo 1, not a new game.

EDIT: I'm not hating, I actually think this will be cool but lets be real, this is a re-make.
Edited by Jesse on Jul 27, 2011 at 05:57 PM

well I personally can't stand classic halo's graphics (or the assault rifle firing sound for that matter) which is why I'm buying this, it'll make halo 1 a much more enjoyable experience for me.

yeah, that's right, I'm a graphics freak.
Edited by Delicon20 on Jul 27, 2011 at 06:05 PM

I still think they should have just remade the game entirely.

That would anger the Halo geezers.

This. Using the old engine just seems lazy. They keep saying it's to preserve the gameplay people remember, but you can get that in...oh, the original game.