Why do you try so hard at being right? I talking to Delicon. What wrongs with the Elites and Brutes exactly? I like them more than Halo 3 becasue Halo 3 brutes look like a teddy bear in covenant armor to me. :/



Google images. You gotta love it. What wrong with the Halo 3 brutes hand? He isn't even holding it right. :/
Edited by RevolutionaryCaptain on Jun 25, 2010 at 12:20 PM

I have nothing against halo reach, it's just I think think the graphics look more cartoony than realistic, sort of like halo 2.

As of now, your opinions are now invalid.

Colbert does not agree. You must be very color blind.

tbh the brutes remind me of locust lol,halo reach is realistic but I just hate the new elites for some odd reason o.o

Your point is very invalid. Your picture prove nothing. We'll have and see who right when Reach come out this.

Because they aren't your buddies anymore.

They are ingame. There rendered ingame, dur. Bungie just used a gray background.

no its not that,its just the new look,they look too fat for some odd reason but they look fine from a view from the side.

Your opinions have been invalid to me for weeks now, and I'm guessing aren't or were'nt a very popular kid in school

also dr.voncutesybear can go F*** himself as far as I'm concerned.
Edited by Delicon20 on Jun 25, 2010 at 03:31 PM

lol delicon is mad b/c he knows he's wrong and he cant prove it....

Delicon did u play the Beta? cause as you can see that is not cartoony. if you want cartoony go play borderlands.

I played the beta a lot, actually. And I noticed how the people look like, they're made of clay, I hated the way the elites looked, idk why, the weapons I will admit looked much better than halo 3, but what got me was the plants and ambience, I saw really ugly yellow green vines, which made me say, "WTF did they do to the graphics?"

and unfortunately for the guy who posted above you, I am not mad, and I can't be wrong because there's no such thing as a wrong opinion, or a right one.
Edited by Delicon20 on Jun 25, 2010 at 04:28 PM

you sound like one of those die hard halo 3 fan boys who have to find somthing they dont like in its Sequel.

No it's just the graphics. Other than that I would totally lose my virginity to this game.

Halo: Reach has the best graphic of any of the Halo. First of all its a beta. Thing will change and Delicon your lossing this auguement. So just stop right there. And amite we're right and your wrong that way we talk about something ele.

first of all post in better english

Second of all quit calling this an argument, it's not. What it is is you guys trying to make my opinion wrong which as I stated before is impossible because there are no right or wrong opinions. The only thing I can say to you now Revolutionary Captain is :



comprende?
Edited by Delicon20 on Jun 25, 2010 at 05:34 PM

Your a copy cat. :<

You make no sense what so ever.






Self pwned.

Here the word "arguement" means: discussion in which disagreement is expressed; a debate.

So it not a debate about Halo: Reach graphics and Halo 3 graphics?
Edited by RevolutionaryCaptain on Jun 25, 2010 at 09:14 PM

I have done no debating, I have only stated my opinion multiple times

i loled :P

Its been activate Vern.

Shh! This suppose to hidden messege![/

Halo Reach is a sequel to Halo 3. Obviously it's been improved.

Not in terms of timeline, in terms of progressive game development.

I laugh when I score headshots.Why shouldn't they?

Race is confirmed as a gametype in Halo Reach. And its much more advanced than Halo 1's.



There were gonna be squirrels running around in Halo Reach, but they got cut up.

ffffff barely any wildlife >=O

dam what is it with bungie and removing wildlife?

From Bungie Weekly Update 06.11.10

Let me clarify on my last ppost my using an example:

Sega GT 2002 for original Xbox:



Forza Motorsport 2 for Xbox 360 (nearly 5+ years later with BETTER graphics):


hmm..... other than a new paintjob and adding some scaled differences, it "basically" looks the same, when your racing it ingame it looks the same since your not paying attention to it.....

its not "what" they remodel, its "how" they remodel it, so when everyone says "look at the new weapons", think of these images and remember that they are all modeled after an older version or idea.
Edited by KillerKip1 on Jun 27, 2010 at 06:55 PM
Edited by KillerKip1 on Jun 27, 2010 at 06:56 PM

Racers always have good graphics, that's because they can afford to stick most of what the GPU has to do on the models.

Then what about this game that came out for original Xbox:
NASCAR 2003
mostly textures:



of course, some might argue that Electric Arts Gaming Industries (a.k.a. EA Games) is a bad game developer. As a matter of fact, look at Sims 2, more copies sold than most other simulation games available, and its still selling for $30+ at Walmart, sometimes will see it for the occasional $20 or $15 clearance though.

You're basing your judgment for a Halo game on a racing game.

...

Um. You're seriously basing your judgment on a first person shooter, a game in an extremely competitive market focused on graphics, on a genre that's focused on physics?

As much as I supported your opinion, backing up your judgment with a RACING game does not do your argument any good.

well, I was meaning to say originally (with that first post there with the GT40's) was that although they update the models, or remodel them, they are not very far off from the previous model. maybe 1k or 2k difference? not very many.

I liked 2 better o_0 almost beat the game then my sister came in and shut it down before I saved..... and I just got about 12 cars unlocked too.... pissed me off