I found a source here


http://www.gamerheadlines.com/2014/10/will-extra-mission-halo-3-xbox-one/

I heard there is a mission name guardian forest that bungie cut out and we will face new enemies.


Edited by sshers4 on Oct 21, 2014 at 09:33 PM

I don't know how I feel about that. Guess we will have to wait and see what it is.

"Could it be that this figure was the boss from Guardian Forest, or at least a version of it?"

-------

"The level would have introduced a new enemy called 'The Guardian'." -
Guardian Forest, Halopedia

Edited by Echo77 on Oct 21, 2014 at 09:56 PM

Absolutely nothing definitive here, it's likely just the epilogue.

I'm not getting my hopes up but if it is true... so awesome.

I think if they were actually doing that they would have said something about it by now.

New things seem to be popping up all the time, like their awesome campaign scoring and medal system. Also we know they are in a rush to get everything ready, hence the 20GB patch so it would not be surprising if an extra mission is something they were unsure of having at launch. Or as DLC.

BREAKING NEWS

A new screenshot has been sighted with an extra 4 MISSIONS OVER THE ORIGINAL LEAK

WILL HALO 3 NOW HAVE 15 MISSIONS???


C'mon guys, don't get your hopes up for a prank that some random did in PS

My theory is the added story they put in through the mcc. Maybe some cgi terminal thing.

343i ruining halo again I see.......

Typically when a production company like 343i work backwards instead of forwards, really it means they are too scared to take any risks, and feel more comfortable playing with the past rather than exploring the future.

I'm really not bummed out that a mission was cut from h3 as it is they made it up by including the map from the mission they cut out in mp.

Not gonna lie, this has piqued my interest in the MCC pretty hard. I was a bit unsure as to how much I could be fussed with an HD re-release of stuff I already have, but the potential of extra missions is definitely a huge bonus.

well we all remember the thing they created when they "explored the future". i would've rather seen a faithful remake of all of the halo2 assets, instead of just the master chef, put into the new engine.

Its the epilogue level.
Is everyone on here high?

Why is everyone talking about h3 having an extra mission or two.
Havent you seen what they are doing to h2!?!

55 missions for Halo 2? My gosh, thats one heck of an extended campaign.

Jobalisk will be rather annoyed...

your right, all that hard work and then they release guardian forest for halo 3 after all, consider me positively fuming... now leave me alone while I curl into a little ball in the corner and cry while muttering things best not mentioned least the ban hammer.

After watching the IGN Stream today, there are 11 missions, but they also mentioned that there's going to be Prologue and Epilogue levels for H2A, so I feel like they might be intending to do the same for Halo 3, as its supposed to lead into H5 in part (evidently they'll be narrated by Locke)

oooo, does that mean they are going to bring back the cut level forerunner ship where you are inside the key ship as it travels towards earth?

That was just suppose to be part of the High Charity level, the internal name is still forerunner ship. Also why it is 15 minutes long.

WHY?!?!

STOP RUINING GAMES 343. DONT FIX SOMETHING THAT AINT BROKE

DO SOMETHING DECENT FOR ONCE ON YOUR OWN

Except Halo 2's campaign sucks and has an awful ending anyway.

.
Edited by Adler on Oct 23, 2014 at 12:32 PM

I beg to differ, I loved the halo 2 campaign, and as far as I know, 343 are not actually changing anything themselves, all they are doing is adding something that Bungie made, so it will probably be pretty good.

Man I remember how much everyone hated H2's campaign and MP back when it came out, it was such garbage. It had 10x more hate than H4 ever got. Even Bungie bashed it and every game since H2, has tried to strip things away introduced in it to make it more like Halo 1. http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Bungie-We-Screwed-Up-Halo-2-2513.html

H4 for it's faults in both MP and SP is still so much more enjoyable than H2. Yes the story is hard to follow and rushed, and yes the new stuff in MP does not give it the same sophistication as prior games and is quite mindless compared to the first 3, but when it is played with all it's mechanics at full throttle (with all it's MP content unlocked, or on Legendary for SP), it plays just fine other than a few hiccups (which every game has).

I really don't care what anyone has to say defending H2, it's an incomplete, poorly thought out game that throws everything it's predecessor did right out the window. It's not a rushed game as people seem to be quick to claim, it had a 3 year development cycle thanks to MS extending Bungie's original release date. There are certainly parts of it that executed pretty great (matchmaking, graphics, sound, cutscenes, and atmosphere), but as a whole it falls flat on it's face. I guarantee you give the MCC a few months after release and H2 will be the lowest played game in it. Anyone who thinks Halo 2 is well designed, go play it on Legendary where all the game mechanics are suppose to be working at their highest potential or a game of MP with a decent group of evenly skilled people.

I really don't understand how anyone who loved the first game can like to play H2 to this day, when you break the game down and analyze it it's an abomination.

In fact, I'm going to do just that.

I think the reason that people defend Halo 2 more than they defend Halo 4 is because, despite whatever gameplay issues it may have had, Halo 2 looked like a Halo game, it felt like a Halo game, and it told a story that didn't seem out of place in what we knew of the Halo universe up to that point.

Halo 4, as a game, might technically be better from a gameplay perspective, but because it's so radically different compared to all of its predecessors, because its story reads like a hard-to-follow fanfic, because the aesthetic suddenly jumped from an almost elegantly simple future to hardcore sci-fi, there's a backlash. It's like the difference between the World War Z book and the World War Z movie: Sure, the movie wasn't necessarily bad, but it's so different from the book that it might as well be a seperate franchise.

But beause it's not a seperate franchise, because they stuck the World War Z label on it, people feel misled or cheated out of what they feel should have been, I guess. It doesn't feel like the franchise they originally grew to love.
Edited by Echo77 on Oct 23, 2014 at 04:44 PM

exactly
you see, this man knows what's up

back on guardian forest again eh?

Are you trying to participate in that discussion by implying stupid things instead of giving actual arguments?

If anything, more Halo 3 is a good thing. :DDD

Wow they actually did add the forest level.
Might actually buy an xboner now.
http://i.imgur.com/UwEGM25.png