
Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:13 PM
Msg. 1 of 35
Normally I'd say XP because of speed and awesomeness.
But.
XP Pros: streamlined, efficient. Cons: no DX10+ support, no support for 3gb+ RAM (when compiling maps RAM needed) vulnerbale to attacks without AV, cannot play newer games (Halo 2)
Vista Pros: Bare minimum for gaming PC. eyecandy wonderland. built in av/uac. 64/32 bit versions available. supprots halo2 and Cons: prone to BSODs, must remove affects for HEK++, overprotective uac prevents debug file saving, sucky driver support.
7 Pros: Best of both worlds, streamlined like XP, pretty like Vista. easy to install drivers for good Halo gaming experience. Cons: UAC overzealous (see vista), visual effects disruptive, visual artifacts in Halo (?), targeted most often by viruses since its the MS 'flagship' product.
Ubuntu Linux Pros: Fast boot times, cant get viruses, free, "faster than a pc and prettier than a mac". Cons: limited driver support, windows program loader required, relies on opensource GL rendering instead of DirectX (frame rates may drop), little to no games run natively.
anyone feel like voting? ill keep track.
XP:3 Vista:3 7:5 Ubuntu Linux: 3 Edited by Actual on Dec 9, 2011 at 06:35 PM
|
|
|

UnevenElefant5
Joined: May 3, 2008
its been fun yall, i'll never forget this site :')
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:16 PM
Msg. 2 of 35
I've never had any of the problems you list for windows 7...
|
|
|

Spartan314
Joined: Aug 21, 2010
Former biped rigger & FP animator
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:18 PM
Msg. 3 of 35
7, because I like it the most, because it's windows 7, because Microsoft named it that, because they felt like it, because they're humans, because humans have feelings, and without feelings we'd be practically braindead.
So if you don't like 7, then you're braindead.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:18 PM
Msg. 4 of 35
to use the default halo directory you have to disable uac, or move it somewhere else. typically 7 has the ebst drivers, but bad ones cause artfacts. and you need a pretty good AV, as 7 is prime target for attacks since its new flagship of MS.
quite frankly i love 7 just as much as XP but no OS is perfect. (yes, looking at you OSX) Edited by Actual on Dec 8, 2011 at 07:19 PM
|
|
|

Dr490nbr347h
Joined: May 28, 2011
Stealin yer Cookies.
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:27 PM
Msg. 5 of 35
300 new virus's each day on 7?
lolwut.
|
|
|

Spartan314
Joined: Aug 21, 2010
Former biped rigger & FP animator
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:28 PM
Msg. 6 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: Actual
to use the default halo directory you have to disable uac, or move it somewhere else. typically 7 has the ebst drivers, but bad ones cause artfacts. and you need a pretty good AV, as 7 is prime target for attacks since its new flagship of MS.
quite frankly i love 7 just as much as XP but no OS is perfect. (yes, looking at you OSX) Edited by Actual on Dec 8, 2011 at 07:19 PM I never disabled UAC and I'm using the default halo directory fine. :/ And I use McAfee AV. Pretty good one, but often has to update or else it won't work properly.
|
|
|

Contrary Smuglord
Joined: May 25, 2011
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:33 PM
Msg. 7 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: Actual Cons: visual artifacts in Halo (?), I never seen these visual artifacts on Halo running in 1920x1080. Quote: over 300 new viruses Yeah if you're an idiot, then you do deserve 300 viruses on your computer.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:33 PM
Msg. 8 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: Spartan314Quote: --- Original message by: Actual
to use the default halo directory you have to disable uac, or move it somewhere else. typically 7 has the ebst drivers, but bad ones cause artfacts. and you need a pretty good AV, as 7 is prime target for attacks since its new flagship of MS.
quite frankly i love 7 just as much as XP but no OS is perfect. (yes, looking at you OSX) Edited by Actual on Dec 8, 2011 at 07:19 PM I never disabled UAC and I'm using the default halo directory fine. :/ And I use McAfee AV. Pretty good one, but often has to update or else it won't work properly. Well, debugs. like when something doesn't work in sapien/guerilla, txt file isn't there. as for viruses, htere's much, much more. that was just an estimate. there are 7 billion people on the planet, of which at the very least 2 million are computer literate or able to reseach enough to make a virus. of those 2 million, id say 400,000 are willing to make a virus for the lulz or money. like i said, W7 is now MS's flagship. what better target? Quote: --- Original message by: Contrary Smuglord Yeah if you're an idiot, then you do deserve 300 viruses on your computer. simple searching/downloading can yield viruses nowadays. the point is that with the amount of viruses targeting windows 7, it simply is unsafe to browse without a proper 50$+ AV or internet secuirty suite. if you can come up with other cons to W7, you're more than welcome, these have just been what i went through using 7 and speculation. Edited by Actual on Dec 8, 2011 at 07:36 PM
|
|
|

DEEhunter
Joined: Dec 16, 2006
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:38 PM
Msg. 9 of 35
It works fine on windows 7. It even has backwards compatibility mode with XP and Vista. I've been going without an antivirus for 5 months now. I download smart. If I really have to scan something I will use virustotal. I usually don't have to download anything anyways. I got everything I need. Things like 3ds max and xsi and such are free from the autodesk site so no need to pirate with the chance at getting a virus.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:39 PM
Msg. 10 of 35
Well, that's that. No arguments for other OS's, so Windows 7 is the best for Halo. ty guys.
|
|
|

Maniac1000
-Helpful Poster-
Joined: Feb 24, 2007
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 07:46 PM
Msg. 11 of 35
Explain you math, why does XP rate a 1?
|
|
|

UnevenElefant5
Joined: May 3, 2008
its been fun yall, i'll never forget this site :')
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 08:03 PM
Msg. 12 of 35
It's number of votes, not like 1 out of 10 :P
|
|
|

Higuy
Joined: Mar 6, 2007
@lucasgovatos
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 08:14 PM
Msg. 13 of 35
I find vista superior to xp. I've been using it since it came out and have hardly had any trouble on my system becuase of it; I'm not sure why everyone complains about it so much. I have Windows 7 on my mothers laptop and I find parts of it annoying (e.g, task bar thing on the top, weird tool bar, etc), but its not much different than vista from the looks.
|
|
|

kirby_422
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Apparently public enemy number 1?
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 09:48 PM
Msg. 14 of 35
XP: Can do anything Halo 1 related perfectly fine. Your complaining about ram.. if you want a XP base with as much ram as you want, go for Server 2003 R2 32bit. its less stable than normal XP, but far more stable than 64bit XP, and through PAE (Physical Address Extension) can use as much ram as you want. I go back and forth between that and W7 64bit on my desktop PC.
Vista: Uses up more of your computers resources by default, just doing H1 stuff your gonna be slowed down.
W7: More optimized Vista, with like 3 more visual changes (I prefer vista visuals. Who wants their windows basic theme to be a very light blue?..)
W8: W7 with tablet interface tossed over it, bootloader removed from boot (bootloader is now AFTER the operating system starts, its freaking retarded. Now you waste time loading two OS' to get the one you want open), no more safemode (so no way to get around viruses (besides, the bootloader being afterboot means that if you have a bad virus, it isnt going to matter anyways, you'd need a bootable CD/DVD/BR/USB/etc)) the replacement is a CMD option, where even with that, it has to reboot to load CMD from somewhere else (so don't think you can load explorer to get some form of imitation safemode. after nagivating to your other partitions, stuff like winrar will work though) If you re-enable your startmenu (defaultly gone and replaced by tablet crap) you will loose any new/additional features added in your user profile, it will just go back to W7.
viruses for windows would basically work on any windows OS, the fact that most programs run seamlessly between OS' is plenty of proof.
Seriously, what big features do you think XP is missing in halo modding?.. If you want your sidebar nagivation, replace your Internet Explorer favorites with shortcuts to all your folders, poof, instant navbar in XP explorer. Want your startmenu search? theres programs for that, etc. You can get all of W7's new features in XP while saving ram, and if its a laptop, battery power too. With more battery life, you can mod longer while on the go.
Linux, works great with HCE, I can even get additional information from HCE that I've never seen in windows, just by launching it from terminal. 3dsmax8 doesnt run correctly (I know I had it running once, forgot what I did) but there is ways to get around it.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 10:23 PM
Msg. 15 of 35
Linux is an awesome OS but it's incompatible to almost everything. using wine makes programs slow down cuz there not running natively. im the one who voted for XP though. but still, lack of dx10 makes xp terrible for gaming, and any patches makes it just as bad as linux; not running natively.
|
|
|

OrangeJuice
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
I hand-paint bumpmaps! ❤ desaturate is baad
|
Posted: Dec 8, 2011 10:50 PM
Msg. 16 of 35
The best Operating System for playing Halo is the one that let's you run it, with such ease!
|
|
|

Masters1337
Joined: Mar 5, 2006
halonaminator's unfortunate idol
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 01:07 AM
Msg. 17 of 35
XP, my FPS on Vista and 7 are terrible when compared to XP.
|
|
|

HaloIsAHorribleGane
Joined: Nov 9, 2010
I'd rather play yahtzee
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 02:43 AM
Msg. 18 of 35
300 viruses daily wow l2 internet Quote: --- Original message by: l283023 Ubuntu4life. I like your style. I dual boot 7 and ubuntu Edited by HaloIsAHorribleGane on Dec 9, 2011 at 02:44 AM
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 02:52 AM
Msg. 19 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGane
300 viruses daily Edited by HaloIsAHorribleGane on Dec 9, 2011 at 02:44 AM for f***'s sake, I'll change it.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 03:09 AM
Msg. 20 of 35
but windows 7 is like a flashing target, to cripple that is to give MS the bird. I don't have Linux or OSX in the options cuz Halo CE & editing kit will not run on them natively.
Really, the only thing ubuntu has going for it is fast as hell boot times and security. Edited by Actual on Dec 9, 2011 at 03:12 AM
|
|
|

HaloIsAHorribleGane
Joined: Nov 9, 2010
I'd rather play yahtzee
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 04:29 AM
Msg. 21 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: Actual
but windows 7 is like a flashing target, to cripple that is to give MS the bird. I don't have Linux or OSX in the options cuz Halo CE & editing kit will not run on them natively.
Really, the only thing ubuntu has going for it is fast as hell boot times and security. Edited by Actual on Dec 9, 2011 at 03:12 AM oh and the fact that it's free, let's not forget that yeah uh use wine on ubuntu. most windows apps run fine on it there's obviously going to be complications since ubuntu has the whole "you have to find drivers manually" aspect, but you can very well run windows apps on ubuntu pretty easilly
|
|
|

kirby_422
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Apparently public enemy number 1?
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 08:53 AM
Msg. 22 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGane yeah uh use wine on ubuntu. most windows apps run fine on it not to mention many of those windows apps even run faster than in windows lol. install MS office in wine, installs like 3x faster, office loads 2x faster, etc. (had to do this because openoffice wasnt liking the special formatting in some homework assignment I was given) Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGane there's obviously going to be complications since ubuntu has the whole "you have to find drivers manually" aspect, but you can very well run windows apps on ubuntu pretty easilly Come on, ubuntu comes with so many drivers lol, I just need to tell it to install my nvidia which it knows about already, and poof, my driver collections on both computers are done. No windows system comes that prepared for either of my computers. anyways, run HCE in wine from terminal, watch the output lol. at the end, it acts as if it was compiling a map.
|
|
|

HaloIsAHorribleGane
Joined: Nov 9, 2010
I'd rather play yahtzee
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 03:29 PM
Msg. 23 of 35
I had a hell of a time getting my monoprice graphics tablet working with Ubuntu. And even then Sai had no pressure sensitivity in wine Gimp worked fine, but Sai is my program of choice Edited by HaloIsAHorribleGane on Dec 9, 2011 at 03:30 PM
|
|
|

SeL
Joined: Dec 15, 2010
twitter.com/TeamFalldog
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 04:17 PM
Msg. 24 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGane Sai furry
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 06:25 PM
Msg. 25 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGane yeah uh use wine on ubuntu. most windows apps run fine on it not to mention many of those windows apps even run faster than in windows lol. install MS office in wine, installs like 3x faster, office loads 2x faster, etc. (had to do this because openoffice wasnt liking the special formatting in some homework assignment I was given) please don't pull things out of your ass. it muddles the results. WINE is a program loader if your crap runs good under linux it'll run better on windows, thats a definite. dont get me wrong, i love linux, ive installed it on every single computer in my house. but when it comes to gaming it fails to deliver. this isnt an os war anyhow, so please restrict discussion to windows based OS's. if anyone has some cons for W7 feel free to mention them. the ones listed, as i said before, are from my expereince with the respective OS's and speculation. Quote: --- Original message by: l283023 People don't make viruses specifically to "cripple" Microsoft or their operating systems. They do it for personal gain (credit card and pin numbers, passwords, etc.). And even though the viruses may be for a specific OS, doesn't mean Microsoft will hurt in the long run. That's because there are people out there who complain about how awful a new Microsoft operating system is, but then go out and buy a copy of Microsoft Windows. I have little to no problems at all using Wine to play games or run Windows applications. pulled that from the mac websites, apprently it's a big problemo for MS marketing. like i said, speculation. ive only gotten 5 viruses with Windows, surprising since i do torrents and stuff, but id imagine tons more out there. Linux has been added to optoins and your votes have been recorded, thank you. Edited by Actual on Dec 9, 2011 at 06:39 PM
|
|
|

Jaz
Joined: Mar 21, 2010
[Insert sarcastic comment here]
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 06:39 PM
Msg. 26 of 35
Best OS for modding/playing Halo titles:
Whichever one you find most comfortable and that actually works on your computer.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 06:41 PM
Msg. 27 of 35
this isn't a flamewar, so that wont work here. just say which os you're comfortable with most halo-wise so any passer-by can discern which works best from the OP.
|
|
|

SeL
Joined: Dec 15, 2010
twitter.com/TeamFalldog
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 07:07 PM
Msg. 28 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 XP: Can do anything Halo 1 related perfectly fine. Your complaining about ram.. if you want a XP base with as much ram as you want, go for Server 2003 R2 32bit. its less stable than normal XP, but far more stable than 64bit XP, and through PAE (Physical Address Extension) can use as much ram as you want. I go back and forth between that and W7 64bit on my desktop PC.
Vista: Uses up more of your computers resources by default, just doing H1 stuff your gonna be slowed down.
If you're really that worried about Windows Defender, UAC, and Vista Aero detracting from your computer's precious performance you can easily turn them off. There is literally nothing stopping you. Also http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/09/why-does-vista-use-all-my-memory.html Add memory management to the list of things Vista does better than XP too. Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 viruses for windows would basically work on any windows OS, the fact that most programs run seamlessly between OS' is plenty of proof.
Just like they run on Linux under wine lol. Also UAC in windows is basically Sudo in Ubuntu, so as far as malware is concerned it's the same rules, if you give a malicious program super user privileges you're going to get compromised. Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 Linux, works great with HCE Hahahahahahahhahahaha no it doesn't what are you talking about. I've used XP through 7, and various linux distributions on a handful of pcs, including on the same ones, and I have NEVER noticed any of these performance hits people complain about. These PCs have ranged in specs from Pentium 4s with 512mb of ram, to my current pc with a Core2Quad and 4GB RAM running Seven, after running Vista. Edited by SeL on Dec 9, 2011 at 07:08 PM
|
|
|

kirby_422
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Apparently public enemy number 1?
|
Posted: Dec 9, 2011 09:50 PM
Msg. 29 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: ActualQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGane yeah uh use wine on ubuntu. most windows apps run fine on it not to mention many of those windows apps even run faster than in windows lol. install MS office in wine, installs like 3x faster, office loads 2x faster, etc. (had to do this because openoffice wasnt liking the special formatting in some homework assignment I was given) please don't pull things out of your ass. it muddles the results. WINE is a program loader if your crap runs good under linux it'll run better on windows, thats a definite. Thing is, it does. I did it on both my PCs, my laptop using a 32bit linux and XP, linux installed office far faster, and loads it far faster. Same with my Desktop, comparing W7 64bit of a 64Bit linux. Linux file systems are intended to be far faster, so its completely reasonable for a program to install to and read from something made to be faster, faster *shrug* All I know is that it goes faster, weather its wines magic, the file systems, or microsoft just failing, who knows, all that matters is it does happens. (Both windows use NTFS, in linux I either use EXT3 or 4, im not sure which one.. ill check some other time) Quote: --- Original message by: SeLQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 XP: Can do anything Halo 1 related perfectly fine. Your complaining about ram.. if you want a XP base with as much ram as you want, go for Server 2003 R2 32bit. its less stable than normal XP, but far more stable than 64bit XP, and through PAE (Physical Address Extension) can use as much ram as you want. I go back and forth between that and W7 64bit on my desktop PC.
Vista: Uses up more of your computers resources by default, just doing H1 stuff your gonna be slowed down.
If you're really that worried about Windows Defender, UAC, and Vista Aero detracting from your computer's precious performance you can easily turn them off. There is literally nothing stopping you. Also http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/09/why-does-vista-use-all-my-memory.html Add memory management to the list of things Vista does better than XP too. Even disabling every service you can, you still can't save as much ram as you can with a clean install of XP leaving the default services.. even adding a reasonable amount of additional crap on xp. Quote: --- Original message by: SeLQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 viruses for windows would basically work on any windows OS, the fact that most programs run seamlessly between OS' is plenty of proof.
Just like they run on Linux under wine lol. Also UAC in windows is basically Sudo in Ubuntu, so as far as malware is concerned it's the same rules, if you give a malicious program super user privileges you're going to get compromised. And since wine isnt always running in the background, you have to go manually load your virus every single time. And yes, UAC is one of the many ways microsoft works everyday at trying to copy linux. Have you seen the konboot stuff? almost (all? idk if W8 Developer Preview or W7SP1 are added yet) versions of windows, and a few outdated linux kernels can be used with any password, so if you either have an outdated linux, or windows, UAC/root is useless (although idk where UAC came into this discussion..) Quote: --- Original message by: SeLQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 Linux, works great with HCE Hahahahahahahhahahaha no it doesn't what are you talking about. I've used XP through 7, and various linux distributions on a handful of pcs, including on the same ones, and I have NEVER noticed any of these performance hits people complain about. These PCs have ranged in specs from Pentium 4s with 512mb of ram, to my current pc with a Core2Quad and 4GB RAM running Seven, after running Vista. And when I said it works great with HCE, I mean its great with HCE. There is a minor thing where sometimes it gives me a message about memory allocated in the same place as halo wants to be, but ya, runs as smooth as in windows, and the 3d processing hooks through wine gives me full active camo without havting to have any graphics fixes for my card, etc.
|
|
|

SeL
Joined: Dec 15, 2010
twitter.com/TeamFalldog
|
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 12:47 AM
Msg. 30 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 Even disabling every service you can, you still can't save as much ram as you can with a clean install of XP leaving the default services.. even adding a reasonable amount of additional crap on xp.
You don't seem to understand the purpose of memory. Quote: And the most important rule of cache design is that empty cache memory is wasted cache memory. Empty cache isn't doing you any good. It's expensive, high-speed memory sucking down power for zero benefit. The primary mission in the life of every cache is to populate itself as quickly as possible with the data that's most likely to be needed-- and to consistently deliver a high "hit rate" of needed data retrieved from the cache. Otherwise you're going straight to the hard drive, mister, and if you have to ask how much going to the hard drive will cost you in performance, you can't afford it. Quote: I'm perfectly fine letting SuperFetch have its way with my system memory. The question shouldn't be "Why does Vista use all my memory?", but "Why the heck did previous versions of Windows use my memory so ineffectively?" I don't know. Maybe the rules were different before 2 gigabytes was a mainstream memory configuration.
The less free memory I have, the better; every byte of memory should be actively working on my behalf at all times. Having free memory is NOT a good thing Kirby, the purpose of RAM is to store commonly used information where it can be accessed at a high speed, instead of read slowly from the hard drive. Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 And when I said it works great with HCE, I mean its great with HCE. There is a minor thing where sometimes it gives me a message about memory allocated in the same place as halo wants to be, but ya, runs as smooth as in windows, and the 3d processing hooks through wine gives me full active camo without havting to have any graphics fixes for my card, etc. Sorry, no. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=2720&iTestingId=14752 I've tried to use it, it doesn't work very well for me, and the issue with WINE is that it's different for everyone, regardless it's still going to be less compatible on linux than it will be on windows. Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 And since wine isnt always running in the background, you have to go manually load your virus every single time. And yes, UAC is one of the many ways microsoft works everyday at trying to copy linux. Have you seen the konboot stuff? almost (all? idk if W8 Developer Preview or W7SP1 are added yet) versions of windows, and a few outdated linux kernels can be used with any password, so if you either have an outdated linux, or windows, UAC/root is useless (although idk where UAC came into this discussion..) That's not what I said at all. I'm simply saying that if you give malicious software sudo privileges in Linux, you're just as screwed as you are if you give it administrative authority in windows with UAC. Linux is far from immune from malware, and anyone saying otherwise is trapped in a fantasy world.
|
|
|

kirby_422
Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Apparently public enemy number 1?
|
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 02:13 PM
Msg. 31 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: SeLQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 Even disabling every service you can, you still can't save as much ram as you can with a clean install of XP leaving the default services.. even adding a reasonable amount of additional crap on xp.
You don't seem to understand the purpose of memory. Quote: And the most important rule of cache design is that empty cache memory is wasted cache memory. Empty cache isn't doing you any good. It's expensive, high-speed memory sucking down power for zero benefit. The primary mission in the life of every cache is to populate itself as quickly as possible with the data that's most likely to be needed-- and to consistently deliver a high "hit rate" of needed data retrieved from the cache. Otherwise you're going straight to the hard drive, mister, and if you have to ask how much going to the hard drive will cost you in performance, you can't afford it. Quote: I'm perfectly fine letting SuperFetch have its way with my system memory. The question shouldn't be "Why does Vista use all my memory?", but "Why the heck did previous versions of Windows use my memory so ineffectively?" I don't know. Maybe the rules were different before 2 gigabytes was a mainstream memory configuration.
The less free memory I have, the better; every byte of memory should be actively working on my behalf at all times. Having free memory is NOT a good thing Kirby, the purpose of RAM is to store commonly used information where it can be accessed at a high speed, instead of read slowly from the hard drive. So apparently vista and 7 do a horrible job at memory management, because when im watching movies, or playing a game, what I want loaded into the memory, is the movies, and the games. Good thing for XP where I can have the memory exactly how I want it; running on the programs im using, rather than default windows crap that I shall NEVER use. Quote: --- Original message by: SeLQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 And when I said it works great with HCE, I mean its great with HCE. There is a minor thing where sometimes it gives me a message about memory allocated in the same place as halo wants to be, but ya, runs as smooth as in windows, and the 3d processing hooks through wine gives me full active camo without havting to have any graphics fixes for my card, etc. Sorry, no. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=2720&iTestingId=14752 I've tried to use it, it doesn't work very well for me, and the issue with WINE is that it's different for everyone, regardless it's still going to be less compatible on linux than it will be on windows. As you link me to the wine page that says HCE is gold, the second highest level of app compatibility.. lol Quote: --- Original message by: SeLQuote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 And since wine isnt always running in the background, you have to go manually load your virus every single time. And yes, UAC is one of the many ways microsoft works everyday at trying to copy linux. Have you seen the konboot stuff? almost (all? idk if W8 Developer Preview or W7SP1 are added yet) versions of windows, and a few outdated linux kernels can be used with any password, so if you either have an outdated linux, or windows, UAC/root is useless (although idk where UAC came into this discussion..) That's not what I said at all. I'm simply saying that if you give malicious software sudo privileges in Linux, you're just as screwed as you are if you give it administrative authority in windows with UAC. Linux is far from immune from malware, and anyone saying otherwise is trapped in a fantasy world. Yes, if you download some random software, from a random source, that developed a package directly for your system type (deb, rpm, etc) rather than source code that you can just read, then you could get a random package. The distribution maintainer can easily supply updates to block those packages, or, you could just choose to install packages from trusted sources *shrug* If the source has been read and has been reliable, changes are its been submitted to a reliable repo. So why exactly are we going on about viruses?.. you mentioned windows stuff going in wine as well as UAC, I shot the wine one down (which then led you further away from the main point?.. idk) Either way, I said what I wanted to many many posts ago (Probably summed it up in my first post..), if you want to keep arguing with me, do it elsewhere, its completely derailing this topic (why was this topic made again?... it seems like its just to bash different OS'..). if you post again directed at me, I'll ignore it (actually, im probably just gonna ignore this topic all together, ive said what I want, and the only things remaining here are arguments)
|
|
|

SeL
Joined: Dec 15, 2010
twitter.com/TeamFalldog
|
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 02:34 PM
Msg. 32 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 So apparently vista and 7 do a horrible job at memory management, because when im watching movies, or playing a game, what I want loaded into the memory, is the movies, and the games. Good thing for XP where I can have the memory exactly how I want it; running on the programs im using, rather than default windows crap that I shall NEVER use.
Quote: SuperFetch is a technology that pre-loads commonly used applications into memory to reduce their load times. It is based on the "prefetcher" function in Windows XP.[9]
The purpose is to improve performance in situations where running an anti-virus scan or back-up utility would result in otherwise recently-used information being paged out to disk, or disposed from in-memory caches, resulting in lengthy delays when a user comes back to their computer after a period of non-use.
SuperFetch also keeps track of what times of day those applications are used, which allows it to intelligently pre-load information that is expected to be used in the near future.
By default the necessary files are loaded into main memory, but using a feature called ReadyBoost, Windows Vista and Windows 7 can use alternate storage such as USB flash drives, thereby freeing up main memory. Although hard disks usually have higher sequential data transfer rates, flash drives can be faster for small files or non-sequential I/O because of their short random seek times. If you're having so many memory issues with Post XP systems maybe you should check if your RAM is faulty, as I've said, I've played with it on multiple computers with a wide variety of specs, and they all perform quite nicely. Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 As you link me to the wine page that says HCE is gold, the second highest level of app compatibility.. lol
Good job reading the list :] As you can see the results are all over the place and range from Garbage (worst) to Plat (best). Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 Either way, I said what I wanted to many many posts ago (Probably summed it up in my first post..), if you want to keep arguing with me, do it elsewhere, its completely derailing this topic (why was this topic made again?... it seems like its just to bash different OS'..). if you post again directed at me, I'll ignore it (actually, im probably just gonna ignore this topic all together, ive said what I want, and the only things remaining here are arguments) Clearly by factually explaining why Vista is superior to XP I'm just here to bash other OSes, it's not like the XP fanboy who just bashes everything post XP because it uses more of his precious memory and runs a few more programs in the background.
|
|
|

Actual
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Dennis has seen some pretty nice asses
|
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 03:00 PM
Msg. 33 of 35
Quote: --- Original message by: kirby_422 (why was this topic made again?... it seems like its just to bash different OS'..). its never made quite certain which os is most compatible with halo. xp, certainly, but what about 7+ that hav new features? you can see i listed pros AND cons to every OS and record results from votes not arguments. what anyone debates onlyhelps the purpose so a passerby can determine os is mostcompatible since everyone has diff experiencs. Edited by Actual on Dec 10, 2011 at 03:01 PM
|
|
|

Jaz
Joined: Mar 21, 2010
[Insert sarcastic comment here]
|
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 03:05 PM
Msg. 34 of 35
I'm confused as to why this argument is even happening. As I said, just use the OS that you find most comfortable and that actually works. A 10% fps increase or 10 minute loading time drop doesn't matter at all as long as you actually like the OS.
|
|
|

ally
Joined: Jun 23, 2010
Aye Ready
|
Posted: Dec 10, 2011 03:17 PM
Msg. 35 of 35
doesn't look like an argument tho, it looks like a covo between 2 ppl just. i know nothing about win7 so can't add anything to that, i have fixed a few pc's with vista on them, and only found the extra prompts annoying. was no big deal, i stick with xp cause i have low ram to spend on an os.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|