The Pistol does, and last I checked (one or two months ago) the Plasma Rifle does too.

Oh my god.THIS IS FUBBLEWUMPING AMAZING Good job masterz

FTFY. But glad you like it.

Still don't know what Masterz's job in CMT is.

lol

I mean the exterior. It's a moot point if they decide to add in entire sections, but leave out making their own take on the Pillar.

I agree with this. If they're overhauling everything else, they might as well do the Autumn for sake of visual consistency.

In the long haul of things, it's pretty insignificant if the exterior changes. Also remember it's BSP, which is a pain in the ass to change, there's a reason we have only edited a single BSP for the entire game and it's also the one that's given us the most problems. Also we can't just put scenery over it, as an object that big often presents lighting and atmospheric oddities.

should make dmr look halo reach-ish

Except the Halo 4 DMR looks infinitely better in every aspect.

except scope

I thought the Reach DMR was terrible looking, the scope especially. it just looks bizarre and cut off, I thought he H4 design, especially the scope was much better. Ours is a good blend of the two though I feel.

personally I preferred reach because of the lenses with had a more reflective looking property

i love the reach, h4 and CMT DMR :l

I mean.
I like the Covenant Carbine.

I like Bourrin's DMR.

:P

Personally, I'd like too have the assault rifle a bit more reach-ish, because the style in here that seems too go more like 4's is more urghy.

I think Halo 4's human weapons are too blocky. I think 1-Reach just had better looking human weapons.

This. Reach took a somewhat more logical approach when it came to weapon design, so the guns look like they make a decent amount of sense. Halo 4 UNSC weapons look like bulky, generic sci-fi guns covered in meaningless greeblies.

So does everyone approve the reach AR? [:)]

I hated it, from its design to strength. I was really glad when the H4 AR looked futuristic and powerful, even going back and taking some design elements from the MA5B. CMT's MA5E is supposed to be sort of a mix of the H:R and H4 AR, which I suppose I'll be OK with. It looks interesting enough.

Going further into that, what made you want to drop the traditional H3 and CMT SPV2 light-gray AR skin and go for a darker tone?

EDIT: I'm referring mainly how the midsection-down on the MA5E is a darker gray, while only the bottom of the MA5C was a dark gray in H3.
Edited by RabbitFood on Oct 7, 2014 at 08:57 PM

Oh god you know what greebles means. We have similar hobbies.

I'm not seeing many MA5B elements in the MA5D. It seems more like an overcomplicated MA5C with a muzzle brake.

Yeah...not really sure if the MA5D has any elements from the MA5B.

Edited by Dumb AI on Oct 7, 2014 at 09:44 PM

Guess we're just looking in different areas.

Since Marines will be getting Rocket Launchers, i hope they won't be reckless with it.

Left-bottom corner
Lol

looks like they are reckless

Yeah no.I got a rocket launcher in H2 once. Gave it too a marine.Was promptly shot in the back. The next time, he got shot in the back. >:)

personally, I favored the halo 3 AR the most, as well as reach dmr, and halo 2 magnum, and h3 sniper(reach is is second place tightly) on a side note, does anyone remember the reach beta plasma grenades? those were... very unique and big grenades

i have to ask, in the release trailer; what are those green grenades? did you recolor the plasma grenades from blue to green?

It's a fuel rod-based cluster grenade, loosely based on WWII-era German "baled charge" grenades in terms of aesthetics.

This is the latest picture that was released for it, though the handle may/may not change.

What about the charges themselves? I think the current handle could work just fine as it is, but the explosive head and secondary charges... they don't appeal to me. Too cartoony.
Edited by Echo77 on Oct 9, 2014 at 04:50 PM

that is a big and long grenade


Edited by UHWArby on Oct 9, 2014 at 05:30 PM