Not at all for me.

Nor for me. It really should be fixed; it would be such a lovely tool to be able to use.

What's the difference between Recorded and Custom animations again? Why not just use custom animations?

You guys must be using it wrong, it works fine

a lot of the software for editing ce works differently for different computers, one such example being hek+

Custom animations are literal animations; they consist only of node transformations.

Recorded animations are actually a bit of a misnomer: they're more like recorded input that can be played back on any given unit. They come with the advantage (in certain situations) that since they're input and not raw animation info they can be used to automatically trigger features built into the units they are played on - such as the Pelican's banking animations and engine sounds or the footstep sounds on a biped. These things can be very difficult, tedious or outright impossible to get working correctly when dealing with raw animation data. For example, it would be an absolute pain to correctly apply pitch and volume scaling to a pre-defined foley sound for a Pelican's engine - and nearly impossible to correctly set the appropriate fade values for its hover/jet thruster attachments; you could just play back input and have the game take care of it automatically.

well it works for me and all i have to do was download
the haloce109patch and it begin to work on my hek its not the perfect recorded anim but its quite good thats my advice for those who dont work
also can we get back on topic please more updates of spv3

dratt make a tutorial please

Those weapons STILL look good!
Edited by OrangeJuice on Nov 5, 2011 at 01:32 AM

hey so i wasnt a member at the time but i read the forums in the old spv2 discussion when you were talkin about whether to use iron sights or the scope or reflex sights for the smg (ah nostalgia) and the topic of zoom came up... it was voted down much to my dismay but that was pre ODST and it actually worked really well in odst with the suppressor on so my question is will your new scoped smg feature... a scope feature?

Well...

Roviet, I don't think CMT would add a scope onto something like that, then ahve nos cope feature. Its probably implemented already, and it just wasn't used in the hunter encounter.

I second this

It really isn't that complicated to figure out how it works; it simply just dosent work on some PC's.

FTFY.

As you can see, the Grunt has been finished. I'll be adding in the yellow, blue hair and hyena penis later.


*right click > img source for the proper size images btw*
Edited by D4NO on Nov 6, 2011 at 08:12 AM

It'd fit right in with a dark grim game such as gears of war, not for halo though.

Oh look it's this guy again.


>Assuming "Hi Resolution" makes things look "gears"
>Immediately means he knows nothing about anything
>Is comparing proper resolution textures to console Halo games
>All are undetailed and blurry because of a technical limitation, not a design limitation
>Bungie attempted to correct this with Reach, having overcome the technical boundary, somewhat

>Jackal is no different to the actual Jackal, apart from higher texture res> detail > undersuit design, which is clean

Hurp. Please leave. It's obvious your covered in bias gunk.

> looks at own join date. Realizes joined this forum on 7/7/7
> am awesome

< trying to green text when not on 4chan
>sigh


Maybe I should save all the textures down to 512 so it looks "halo" to you.
Edited by D4NO on Nov 6, 2011 at 08:27 AM

@D4NO, this jackals is just AWESOMEEEE ! nice job again :D

Impressive model.
If it was me making I'd put more feathers and a beak, but ye, still. cool.
Cant wait to see the shield

Why would I put a beak on the jackal.

"If It was me making it"

Please, proceed.

Oh I'm sorry, all my reference pictures of the Jackal from bungie must be wrong then.


Also, the model isn't impressive. The model is actually quite bad and I had alot of annoyance working with it.

The model isn't what I did. The paint/hi poly model are.
Edited by D4NO on Nov 6, 2011 at 08:37 AM

Its supposed to be birdish

Ed:
(clearly seeing you're subject to rage)
So Its just a rip + minor edits huh ? Idk i like seeing new things and i liek the beak idea
Could you video record yourself when making this kind of things ? It can be really helpful for wannabe texturers
Edited by bourrin33 on Nov 6, 2011 at 08:44 AM

Just becuase you can make beautiful art dosent mean you need to be a dick.

And by the way, fix the eye. It dosent even look like an eye, just a big ol blob of purple.
Edited by Higuy on Nov 6, 2011 at 08:40 AM

I'm not really being a dick though. Just testing something.

Eye's meant to be like that btw.

If you look closely, you can still notice that small slit running vertically through the eyeball. In yours I do not really see that, just a big ball with some minor detail in it.
Edited by Higuy on Nov 6, 2011 at 08:54 AM

I was in fact talking about your art STYLE, "dark and grim" has NOTHING to do with "hi resolution" or whatever.

> Dano cannot read
> Or
> Dano cannot handle any form of crit
> Your art looks dark and grim, I did not say it looked bad, but halo is more known for a more colorful flair rather than dark and grim gears of war style art.
> Dano is easily offended
> Why am I using ">"
> In belgium we have a yoghurt known as Danone, it is light and tasty, unlike your art, which is dark and grim.
> Apologies for giving feedback to a dick who cannot handle crit

Normal map.





Feedback, not Feedbag. Put down the doritos and actually know what your talking about.


Let's re iterate:

*Post's viewports with no lighting what so ever, and a render with dark moody lighting to show off detail and be less ambient*

DIS NOT BLOOM AND LOW RES PURPLE SLICK, DIS NOT HALOL.

Please.
Edited by D4NO on Nov 6, 2011 at 09:24 AM
Edited by D4NO on Nov 6, 2011 at 09:25 AM

I judge what I see, I don't give a rat's behind what technical mumbo jumbo you use to justify it.
Go shave your beard and actually know what you're talking about.

You judge what you see, disregarding any context or thought what so ever. What a lovely way of thinking. Do you attend Clan rallies by any chance?

Please don't copulate and create more people who think like you.

I could post any number of shots of the jackal from various artsy renders and poses that look even more "edgy" then my posted shots in certain lighting situations.

Playing game > seeing in action

vs

Obvious viewport and obvious dark single lighting render.

I'd love to prove you wrong and make a lovely big lit up colourful render for you, but I don't give that much of an F.

In simple words you want us to say Its perfect.
I wantz beck.

Holy cow dude you have serious personality issues. Why do you even bother posting work if you cannot handle ANY form of crit AT ALL. Even with bourrin's beak suggestion you went BERSERK.

Hell you would go berserk if somebody said your texture had a scratch too many, and immediately jump to the conclusion that person would not know what they are talking about.

Lmao I'm done with you :L
But I'll still give my opinion on your work in the future

The diffuse you posted does not have it either.

I like the grimness of the model, I've always wanted halo to look as dark as the story feels

last time a i checked, thats a requirement.

oh and all this seems pretty cool. maybe ill reinstall HCE.


also, dark and grim=good
tr00 and kvlt=better
Edited by SiMuLaCrUm on Nov 6, 2011 at 12:10 PM

tr00 and kvlt?

Texture is awesome and model is inaccurate, but still a good model. For the jackal, it does need to have beaklike snout. It's just one of the distinct features of the character.