
Mysterion
Joined: Aug 9, 2008
Nice shot, but too bad your @$$ just got SACKED!!!
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 05:42 PM
Msg. 36 of 108
Grunts with Flamethrowers...
|
|
|

Nexus Halo
Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Halo's Dark Knight http://www.nexushalo.kk5.org/
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 06:18 PM
Msg. 37 of 108
Yea, the Deathstar is not a big threat. Just move all the ships to the side that the big lazer isn't. If a Jedi took the MC one on one the Jedi would most likely win. I mean, all they have to do is force push him off a cliff. Or even force hold him in the air and walk up with his lightsaber and stab him. The Arbiter sucks, he doesn't equal 10 Jedi. 10 Jedi can focus on 10 parts of his body and force pull him to pieces.
Post jumps from different posts. No quotes.
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 07:05 PM
Msg. 38 of 108
Spartans can hijack the deathstar :P
|
|
|

malard
Joined: Apr 12, 2009
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 07:43 PM
Msg. 39 of 108
rebels would get owned by the weapons of covenent and the covenent would get owned by jedi so out coome is the army of mc's that fall from the sky in the middle of the battle win xD
|
|
|

RougeSpartan414
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Angatar, the Iron-Father.
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 07:45 PM
Msg. 40 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Advancebo Spartans can hijack the deathstar :P They can hijack it, but that doesn't mean they can use it.
|
|
|

bigfoot343
Joined: Jan 27, 2009
Madness? THIS IS HALO!!!!
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 08:04 PM
Msg. 41 of 108
covenant would win. reason:rebels are meatbags
for you lone warrior Edited by bigfoot343 on Jun 15, 2009 at 08:05 PM
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 08:07 PM
Msg. 42 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: RougeSpartan414Quote: --- Original message by: Advancebo Spartans can hijack the deathstar :P They can hijack it, but that doesn't mean they can use it. They can also use the TIE fightrs... owai...
|
|
|

Dennis

Joined: Jan 27, 2005
"We are made of starstuff.” ― Carl Sagan
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 08:07 PM
Msg. 43 of 108
Actually they would never meet. Star Wars was "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away" and Halo is 4,560 years in the future.
Maybe the Forerunners were part of the Star Wars empire?
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 08:09 PM
Msg. 44 of 108
The way of the force is with the forerunners. May they walk the path with force.
|
|
|

malard
Joined: Apr 12, 2009
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 08:17 PM
Msg. 45 of 108
and maybe mc built a time machinie and killed all the starwars people and that is why there is no star wars episode 7?
|
|
|

Lone Warrior
Joined: Dec 14, 2008
-Himalayan Wizard and Mystical Guru of the Mts.-
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:06 PM
Msg. 46 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: bigfoot343
covenant would win. reason:rebels are meatbags
for you lone warrior Edited by bigfoot343 on Jun 15, 2009 at 08:05 PM +rep Also, Dennis is right. However, the thought of the Forerunners being part of the Star Wars universe is quite funny. Now what faction would they have belonged to...
|
|
|

k9colin
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Piss Off I'm -BLAM!-ing
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:11 PM
Msg. 47 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Lone WarriorQuote: --- Original message by: bigfoot343
covenant would win. reason:rebels are meatbags
for you lone warrior Edited by bigfoot343 on Jun 15, 2009 at 08:05 PM +rep Also, Dennis is right. However, the thought of the Forerunners being part of the Star Wars universe is quite funny. Now what faction would they have belonged to... Hutts, durrr.
|
|
|

Karrde
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Power beyond containing
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:11 PM
Msg. 48 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Dennis Actually they would never meet. Star Wars was "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away" and Halo is 4,560 years in the future.
Maybe the Forerunners were part of the Star Wars empire? The Forerunners were actually the same race that created the Star Forge. They are called the Rakata. They also came up with the original Death Star plans, which were modified by the Geonosians and passed on to the Sith. And in Star wars, blasters fire a coherent beam of highly concentrated energy, allowing them to be deflected by lightsabers. Bullets would be incinerated by a lightsaber's heat, but bullets also travel much faster than blaster bolts, meaning they would be incredibly difficult to deflect. Therefore Spartans with fully automatic projectile weapons > Jedi [/genious] And Halo takes place 500 years in the future, not 4,560 lol
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:17 PM
Msg. 49 of 108
Yes but Star Wars in our period of time takes place a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.
Star Wars Era>Present>Halo Era 100,000 BC>21st century>25th century.
|
|
|

Dennis

Joined: Jan 27, 2005
"We are made of starstuff.” ― Carl Sagan
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:22 PM
Msg. 50 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Karrde And Halo takes place 500 years in the future, not 4,560 lol Erk.. really bad typo, I meant 540 years. 2550 - 2010 = 540 (2550 was the year we contact the Covenant and lose Harvest and in the Halo CE Chronicles, Carters World) Also particle weapons are much faster than projectile weapons. Particle weapons travel at near the speed of light, which means that the Jedi were prescient and knew where they would be before they were fired so they could position the lightsaber to deflect them. Yea… the Jedi are looking pretty powerful with that revelation.
|
|
|

Karrde
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Power beyond containing
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:28 PM
Msg. 51 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: DennisQuote: --- Original message by: Karrde And Halo takes place 500 years in the future, not 4,560 lol Erk.. really bad typo, I meant 540 years. 2550 - 2010 = 540 (2550 was the year we contact the Covenant and lose Harvest and in the Halo CE Chronicles, Carters World) Also particle weapons are much faster than projectile weapons. Particle weapons travel at near the speed of light, which means that the Jedi were prescient and knew where they would be before they were fired so they could position the lightsaber to deflect them. Yea… the Jedi are looking pretty powerful with that revelation. I don't agree with that. When a blaster fires, cou can watch the beam travel from the barrel to it's target. If it was traveling at the speed of light, you wouldn't be able to see a thing, and you certainly wouldn't have time to deflect it, even with Jedi senses.
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:32 PM
Msg. 52 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: DennisQuote: --- Original message by: Karrde And Halo takes place 500 years in the future, not 4,560 lol Erk.. really bad typo, I meant 540 years. 2550 - 2010 = 540 (2550 was the year we contact the Covenant and lose Harvest and in the Halo CE Chronicles, Carters World) Also particle weapons are much faster than projectile weapons. Particle weapons travel at near the speed of light, which means that the Jedi were prescient and knew where they would be before they were fired so they could position the lightsaber to deflect them. Yea… the Jedi are looking pretty powerful with that revelation. whos we?
|
|
|

Lone Warrior
Joined: Dec 14, 2008
-Himalayan Wizard and Mystical Guru of the Mts.-
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:38 PM
Msg. 53 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: AdvanceboQuote: --- Original message by: DennisQuote: --- Original message by: Karrde And Halo takes place 500 years in the future, not 4,560 lol Erk.. really bad typo, I meant 540 years. 2550 - 2010 = 540 (2550 was the year we contact the Covenant and lose Harvest and in the Halo CE Chronicles, Carters World) Also particle weapons are much faster than projectile weapons. Particle weapons travel at near the speed of light, which means that the Jedi were prescient and knew where they would be before they were fired so they could position the lightsaber to deflect them. Yea… the Jedi are looking pretty powerful with that revelation. whos we? We as a human race.
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 09:40 PM
Msg. 54 of 108
Wai what, we meant the covenant already? oshi, the way the world ends is coming closer than we think :Q
|
|
|

RougeSpartan414
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Angatar, the Iron-Father.
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 10:28 PM
Msg. 55 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Dennis Actually they would never meet. Star Wars was "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away" and Halo is 4,560 years in the future.
Maybe the Forerunners were part of the Star Wars empire? Halo is set in the years 2552/2553... 2552 - 2009 = 541 2553 - 2009 = 542 Where'd you get 4,560 years in the future from? E: Crap, didn't see that Dennis fixed it. Disregard this post! Edited by RougeSpartan414 on Jun 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM
|
|
|

Eden
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
I am your sword.
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 11:50 PM
Msg. 56 of 108
The Halo Ring is out of the question. The ring would kill the Covenant as well. The Death Star though, is more effective. Just target the Elite homeworld. Boom. Gone. Much better than glassing. But because this is Rebels Vs Covenant, Covenant would win, as much as I like Star Wars.
|
|
|

shadowslayer123
Joined: Feb 22, 2009
Not the american average
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2009 11:58 PM
Msg. 57 of 108
i bet the death star would aim at halo and miss by about 1000 miles
|
|
|

Eden
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
I am your sword.
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 01:55 AM
Msg. 58 of 108
That is a biased and inaccurate judgement. The Death Star never misses, in the films, and just because its firing at your Halo Ring does not mean it will miss. Of course, it is possible it could miss, but it is highly unlikely, and you certainly wouldn't bet your money on it. Edited by Eden on Jun 16, 2009 at 01:56 AM
|
|
|

Sabre
Joined: Dec 10, 2008
I joined RB in protecting Donut's avatar.
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 02:23 AM
Msg. 59 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Eden
That is a biased and inaccurate judgement. The Death Star never misses, in the films, and just because its firing at your Halo Ring does not mean it will miss. Of course, it is possible it could miss, but it is highly unlikely, and you certainly wouldn't bet your money on it. Edited by Eden on Jun 16, 2009 at 01:56 AM Hey it's a win-win situation, if it doesn't hit, you get money, if it does, you die and noone loses money :D
|
|
|

new101
Joined: May 18, 2009
All for one and one for all
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 02:25 AM
Msg. 60 of 108
George Lucas needs to talk to bungie =P
|
|
|

pwner5889
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 05:57 AM
Msg. 61 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: new101 George Lucas needs to talk to bungie =P Yeah, I tihnk there should be some kind of a conlfict etween Halo and Star Wars. lol
|
|
|

Cocaine
Joined: Mar 2, 2009
Can't stop napping.
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 06:38 AM
Msg. 62 of 108
The rebels could possibly win small skirmishes against the Coveneant if they had Luke Skywalker with them , but ONE Luke Skywalker isnt going to be able to destroy the Coveneant Holy Cities and armadas. They are all pinnacles of Coveneant technology , and unlike the Death Star , lack an Exhaust Pipe from which to fire a few Proton Torpedos into. The rebels dont have the Death Star anyhow , and it can only fire once every 24 hours. Halo does not qualify as a weapon , it's a wild card in the game of war , if they're desperate enough , they could pull the trigger and wipe everyone out. Even if the rebels did get a Death Star (The 2nd one which has an enhanced targeting system to enable it to fire on Ships , and has an improved reactor , thus able to fire more then once every 24 hours , all the coveneant would need to do is to send in a single seraph , provide a distraction , and let it cause a chain reaction of the reactor). So the Coveneant still pwn rebels.
|
|
|

SiMuLaCrUm
Joined: Oct 25, 2006
too digital
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 09:37 AM
Msg. 63 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Sabre Chuck Norris. Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. Chuck Norris is overrated... I'd say the Covenant. They could just find the planet the Rebels are on and glass it.... Also, Seraph > X-wing... One more thing: Star Wars > Star Trek...
|
|
|

Cocaine
Joined: Mar 2, 2009
Can't stop napping.
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 10:13 AM
Msg. 64 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: SiMuLaCrUmQuote: --- Original message by: Sabre Chuck Norris. Wrong wrong wrong and wrong. Chuck Norris is overrated... I'd say the Covenant. They could just find the planet the Rebels are on and glass it.... Also, Seraph > X-wing... One more thing: Star Wars > Star Trek... That's an Overstatement , Chuck Norris is so Underrated that he's coming back around the other side to be seen as Overrated. All Trekkies hate you now.
|
|
|

Karrde
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Power beyond containing
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 12:48 PM
Msg. 65 of 108
I would say Star Wars beats Star Trek. I mean think about it: In Star Wars, the warships are much larger, and contain several squadrons of fighters, which could easily overwhelm any ship from Star Trek. Except, perhaps, a Borg cube.
|
|
|

Nexus Halo
Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Halo's Dark Knight http://www.nexushalo.kk5.org/
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 03:57 PM
Msg. 66 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Karrde I would say Star Wars beats Star Trek. I mean think about it: In Star Wars, the warships are much larger, and contain several squadrons of fighters, which could easily overwhelm any ship from Star Trek. Except, perhaps, a Borg cube. Not to mention Star Wars have Jedi. They'd just use the force to rip off Spocks ears and kill everyone in the ship. Star Wars FTW, Star Trek FTL.
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 05:45 PM
Msg. 67 of 108
Where does the Halo variable come from :\? Its not like the Covenant own Halo. I wouldnt consider Halo as a weapon for the covenant.
|
|
|

Gamma927
Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Steam: gamma927
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 06:03 PM
Msg. 68 of 108
Star Destroyers are Imperial ships.
|
|
|

pwner5889
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 06:38 PM
Msg. 69 of 108
Quote: --- Original message by: Lord_Lelouch
Covenant lack one thing "Humans" in order to activate the Installations. Of course in Halo 3 the Covenant and the UNSC become alliesand it possible the UNSC even joined into the Covenant in order to increase the world's prosperity. So, as for that it is possible that the Covenant with the Human race as part of them could own the Installations. If I were a Jedi I be more worried about the Flood who for some reason no one knows when they were created, who made them, how many there are, or their homeworld. So with that....
Flood. . . PWNZ Rebels Edited by Lord_Lelouch on Jun 16, 2009 at 06:06 PM The covenent did not become allies with the UNSC, only the elites did.
|
|
|

Advancebo
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2009 06:46 PM
Msg. 70 of 108
Where in Canon does it say Grunts, Jackals, Drones, etc side with Elites and Humans? Just because Truth, Mercy, and Regret are dead doesnt mean anything. They still have the same religious beliefs. So there is still a Covenant.
|
|
|