This is only 1/4, or so, of the animation we are doing =P

Its a simple render photo done by our animator, and he chose a random model, and it took about 1/2 an hour to load.

Its pretty detailed, I am talking about the cart, not the floor, or wall.
Maybe I will post up an image with the highest detail, but maybe 2 hour loading? longer? (definatly not shorter), but our animator, Lynch, has a LOT of computer power.

So it just gives you a range of how long it would take to render a high poly model.

It looks good. But if you plan on putting it in CE, then tough luck. It will spit it out like a Llama spits in your face.

Well duh it took that long, the resolution has to be over my monitor size (1920 x 1800). It is pretty detailed, and its a decent model. Not really sure what your showing here though then a render.

Read the entire first part of this thread, my post, I never intended this for CE, would never work.

IAWTP

also, why would you model that? honestly, who would actually model a cart? Alpha maps ftw
Edited by Invader Veex on Feb 18, 2009 at 08:31 PM

Wheels are disgusting.

Why would it take so long to load a model like that? Even in CG movies they dont make props like that so high poly.

you could just make a box type thing, then make a bitmap that is partially transparent...

I also don't see this "animation" you're talking about. Post a GIF if anything. Also, stop posting your work in this forum. IT has nothing to do with CE and non of us are overly interested.

so hey can i hammer a sign that reads "irony" on this thread? he posts about his halo cgi movie, you guys doubt his abilities and ask to see work, then when he FINALLY posts some, you all say that you dont care and bash him for it. gee

some1 making a shopping center lol

Here is the high DPI quality, we have this ability, and about some of the textures, we were missing the rims, and the hood does not match, eh, still looks good.
Edited by KillerKip1 on Feb 19, 2009 at 01:28 PM

I like the door.

Something looks wrong though.

some textures were missing.

The back looks horrible, tbh

No. There's something off with the shape.

It has no under-carriage part, like a truck like that would normally have a lot of exposed machinery on the bottom, but there is none on your truck. And the canvas needs to have sort of like a box thing under it, right now it just looks like it's floating. Maybe you just can't see it because of the angle though and TBH the canvas is too boxy, make it more liks is curves in towards the center of the top part, but I do love the front part.
Edited by UnevenElefant5 on Feb 19, 2009 at 08:18 PM

What rendering engine?

How very mature of you.

Damn, you beat me to it.

Ignore my bad handwriting.

Its a render image, to show the quality that we can make our movie, read the the first post, and the second one with the image I made, read both, ALL OF THEM.

I was missing some textures, the rear tarp is stretched abnormally, IDK why, and the rim texture was missing.

Its a demonstration photo, nothing more, and the textures might be off a bit, but we are not all perfect.

The bald tires are because of the missing textures, it was attached to the rim texture.

I wasn't saying it was bad. I was just showing you what needed to be fixed so it can get better :|

Okay, but we did not make the model, it was loaned to us, long story, not going to get into it at the moment.

And its a quality test, as in "The image quality for detail".

BTW, the first model is low poly. really low
Edited by KillerKip1 on Feb 20, 2009 at 05:27 PM

I hope your not talking about the Shopping trolley model. As if thats low poly, my computer die trying to see whats high poly.

Its all tubes, and cylinders, and a glossy chrome finish! lol

also, it has some extra grip thingies =P
Edited by KillerKip1 on Feb 20, 2009 at 05:36 PM

Its showing what the quality of the film will be, so, more or less, yes.

those renders are horribly unrealistic

unknown length, we are not worried about that at this moment, "maybe" 1:30:00.

its about halo