-I hope that all spv3 get cancelled!

-I would stream & review all your spv3 project!


-With the new update of el dewrito spv3 will die!

Edited by Halonimator on Dec 27, 2015 at 12:33 AM

That is how I've interpreted this whole shebang as well.
I can't help but find it somewhat disrespectful towards those who invested so much time into TSC:E original.

Offtopic MSG:
Pls don't feed the trolls
Edited by Kinnet on Dec 27, 2015 at 08:32 AM

I've never really understood the dismay towards release dates not being met.

I mean, okay technically a promise was broken but at least Tsce didn't self cancel it's self altogether.

I dont hate SPV3 and CMT , only Masterz.


Edited by Halonimator on Dec 27, 2015 at 10:03 PM

While I certainly enjoyed TSC:E, I can also understand the changes.


TSC:E was designed to be a completely stand-alone map. This is reflected in the boss battles, the availability of every weapon, and the variety of vehicles.

It's design simply doesn't fit the pacing of a longer-term campaign, independent of how you feel about the tag-set.



Do I agree with all of CMT's decisions? Not particularly passionately, but I feel like a lot (most) are good calls given the scope of the project.
Edited by WWLinkMasterX on Dec 28, 2015 at 03:08 AM

^ Pretty much this. Despite differences with how Evolved did it's tagset, they would agree the content and the function and uses for it, wouldn't work in a larger 10-15 mission long campaign.

How much per fish?

5 tags. Two with the map editor. 17 if you only have shader_transparent_chicago.

You finally answered Scooter's ultimate question. HP Baxxter is pleased.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKgMfK_dXeo

A second sneak peak at our Custom soundtrack.
Edited by Masters1337 on Jan 5, 2016 at 02:14 PM

This has probably already been asked, but are there any mechanical differences between the Marines and ODSTs, or are they purely aesthetic?

I'm of the same mindset, but there's always the inevitable barrage of "Release date when?" posts.

Just aesthetic.

Will there be anything from Halo 2's soundtrack that will be featured here?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIrjgdgAvkA

sup fellas how goes the progress?

Sorry for the quietness. Stuff is still happening. Bug-squashing and asset polishing just doesn't make for terribly sexy updates. Apart from one or two little features still being toyed with as cool bonuses, the mod is basically feature-complete.

That doesn't mean we're done though, the next few months will be dedicated to getting as much of this kitchen sink as polished and presentable as possible. Stay with us, we'll have more to say soon...








Probably.

Bug-squashing?

If you're asking what it means, generally it's looking for and correcting any glitches and other issues in a program.

And with us, it also means getting stuff done that should have been done a while back. My lazy ass needs to stop studying so much and get to work :v

99 little bugs in the code, 99 little bugs, take one down, patch it around, 278 little bugs in the code

Hey masterz1337 its hokiebird 428 going to legendary walkthrough spv3 before or after release?

Yep

arent you the same guy from the Canon Fodder answers? brian reed?
Edited by Halonimator on Feb 3, 2016 at 09:23 PM

Awesome. Isn't it supposed to be the "Keyes" skull, though?

Never enable the angry skull.

There is an error. You guys typed "on on" in the sentence, "When someone completes all missions with all skulls on on Noble (AKA NASO), we will unlock all skulls on by default for all players."
Edited by P3 on Feb 24, 2016 at 07:55 PM

In that context, the first "on" is used in the same way as "activated" would be. "When someone completes all missions all skulls [activated] on Noble, we will unlock all skulls on by default for all players."

Although it would make more sense with a comma between the 2 on's. it is actually what it is meant I believe.

"Complete all missions with all skulls on, on Noble..."

Better way might have been "All skulls on, for Noble difficulty..."


Or that.

even just one 'on' would do the trick tbh

Since we are arguing about Masterz' grammar:

it's technically right, but it sounds weird. "(with skulls on (on) Noble...)"

Or he could have said: " With skulls activated in Noble mode..."

Or: Use one 'on' and let the skulls' state of being 'on' as in, opposite of 'off' be implied.

Or we could get over it and ask how I'm doing with the loadouts UI :v





NOTES

- Colors are not final
- Each loadout will obviously have different weapon images and such.
- This is still experimental, but we really needed new bitmaps for the loadouts.
- Does anyone know the name of the font in the CMT ui? Yeah, funny that as a CMT member I don't know that, and the new interface designer to boot.
- Should I use the opaque icons for weapons or the outlined images?
- The final product will be far lower resolution than this, sadly.

Questions, comments, critiques, and suggestions are most welcome.
Edited by Jesse on Feb 26, 2016 at 02:21 AM

Is this bitmap for when the button is highlighted? Either way I think the glow is too overpowering, and should only be applied to the outer edges. Something like this:



Edited by raffgie on Feb 26, 2016 at 05:24 AM