Thoughts? Your a complete and utter idiot and don't have a clue what your talking about...

I think you did. Halo CE remake is not using the same engine... it's pretty damn obvious and has been said SO many times...

An assassination was done during the video, and the visual graphics look amazing... how could this engine produce graphics like that.. if it could we could do this. Why would they update this engine.. whats the point in recreating the Reach engine by updating this engine...

Pretty flipping obvious it's the Reach engine... idiot.

...Just about to quote something from your first post but you have gone off and cried and edited it. It doesn't take a genius to see that they are not using this engine though. Dumbest thing I have herd that is...

And that's all this community thinks about, ripping. "Oh look at all of these HALO 1 things we can take because we are to dumb to learn". /end thread.

There we go, a separate graphics engine, for all of these fancy graphics. Maybe I was wrong by saying specifically the REACH engine but it still has a different engine to run them kind of graphics which is pretty obvious..

This engine wouldn't run that kind of thing...

...I fail to see how this is bad. We know exactly what to expect and won't have to sit through a bunch of new game-breaking features (a-la Halo: Reach, even though I did still like Reach,) plus we get to go back and relive Halo in an updated, extra-beautiful way. Considering a lot of people liked how Halo CE used its environments spectacularly, I don't get why going back and seeing them with an updated look is bad.

DAMN hunter, have you failed to notice that the Multiplayer is in reach's engine ( DLC for reach users and seperate disk for the remake of ce (just like h3 odst) ) while the single player uses halo 1's engine/code with an extra layer of code for the enhancements like normal maps and what not.

Either way it's got a different rendering engine... and there is SOO much more than just normal maps... that's a fraction or less that is updated...

It may have a different rendering engine, however it's built to work exactly like ce in terms of maps and bitmaps. It's halo CE's code with updates.

I'm getting really sick of all this whining.

Frank O'Connor just talked about Halo Anniversary on G4 TV as well as Halo 4.

He says Halo Anniversary is THE Halo 1 Engine, just upgraded graphical to look much better but everything is still kept. Core gameplay, physics, and all the rest. It's going to be $40. Multiplayer is Reach because they don't want to split up the Reach community which is a good move since well...do you really want another Halo game coming out already and separating the community? And then with Halo 4, separating it even more? I don't.


And before you go saying "I ALREADY BOUGHT THIS CRAP," think for a bloody second. Don't you think they deserve money for spending all the resources they did to overhaul all the aesthetics to the game? It's all completely justified, except for a 360 only release. THAT isn't >_>

Hello read this people!!

its not gonna have AAs is it? please say no..please say no...

The multiplayer is still being decided whether it should be an expansion for Halo: Reach or a separate multiplayer with Halo 1's online w/ an added Netcode for Xbox Live compatibility.

AAs?????

armor abilities.

Nope.

No i don't agree at all.

Gameplay > Graphics, we all say that if you've played your very first game in the late 1990s or early 2000s

I pitty you, feel the need try and make some "clever" response, by displaying my mistake in grammar, which still doesn't affect the way the word is said. You fail at life.

Large difference in asking stupid questions and not having an A in English, which of course has nothing to do with this community.

now now kids