I probably need to bump up my specs too.

Intel 3RD gen i7

Graphics card: GT 610 2GB

8GB of RAM

Yeah mine still kicks butt at running dual displays but when you hook up a HDMI screen, it starts to show.

#Sadnesswilneverend
I will cut her arms with a razor blade

everyone here has a better spec than me, and I would bet money on that statement

ill beat that, I struggle running halo at 30 fps and my laptop overheats from it. if anyone beats that, bring it, desktop is amd cpu with gpu NVidia 6800 gt

meh, my PC is as old as Halo CE. Bought it wayyy back in 2001 but it still runs "quite" smoothly.
(having troubles on CMT SPV3 though) w/ a 2-core amd CPU and 512mb Nvidia 9400 GT. I'm quite happy playing BF2. Saving for a console takes me 5 years.

you beat my pc and Lt

did yous see this http://youtu.be/j8PB7Vrdb7g CRY ENGINE 3 fools

Now now Dennis, it's just dark humor.
Besides, nowadays the word "retard" is used metaphorically.

Why is this thread even here?

These are BLAM! forums, not CryDev. -_-

And of all the games, you all want to port CE, which is apparently outdated, if you want to use CryEngine 3....
JUST MAKE YOUR OWN ******* GAME!!! FFS!!!
>:O

There's my tiny rant.


>:O
Edited by hobbet360 on Dec 18, 2013 at 08:07 AM





...

THAT IS ALL TO DO WITH YOUR COMPUTER AND YOUR INTERNET!!!




Aye aye!



Damn straight!



... and then make their own games! :)



Welcome to BLAM!.

#jointheblamclub



What happened to intellectual property?

oh wait... M$ took it.



better than mine. :\






#iamsotireditis0020inthemiddleofthenight
Edited by hobbet360 on Dec 18, 2013 at 08:20 AM

Exactly, they think blam engine failed when we have OS which is 100 times better than cry engine 3 has and other engines.

I haven't try them out because it's waste of time.

You're not giving me any evidence why OS is not better than cry engine 3.


OS you can do lightening. Show me proof.

Cry engine?.. Optimized?.. Yeah, them Super PCs that died when they placed Crysis 1 on high and the plethora of stability issue + lack of customization options to make the game run smoother until 1 year after it was released?.. No. Cry engine is easily one of the most poorly optimized engines out there, both graphically and stability wise. Try unreal or the engine that Just Cause 2 ran on. You can run ANY computer in the past 5 years (non gaming) and manage to get at least 40fps on that game on low-med. I played it with a laptop and still had at least 35fps. On top of that, just cause 2 is still one of the largest, most beautiful games to date. Even on low and medium, the game looks beautiful. That's what optimization is.

I rather have fun than have an engine that can run better graphics :)

"You can swim."
Who needs swim when you are spartan?

Edited by Horeb on Dec 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM

Stop with that

But cry engine 3 allows you to do good lightening effect, ragdoll and even 32 players, time lapse, wind, destruction and you can interact with the scenery like moving them.

Beat that idiot.

Blam engine is gone now lolz admit it you fools.

Can you be quite Blam engine can do the samething how many times I have to say this?

does anyone realize that it's better because its more modern? of course there are bigger pros like dx11 and swimming

Speaking as a user of both engines I can say: CryEngine IS better for full-depth game development, but Blam is more FUN. You can just goof around and make fun stuff relatively quickly.

Why does this Topic even exist? Didn't last time this happen Dennis closed it before NO ONE CARES?

Close this crap leave the Cry to another forums for gods sake, if you don't wanna use the Halo engins we use that's fine, but don't come over to our world trying to force us to yours when none of us even give a dam bout your little engins.

Btw I looked at that video, please tell me this was all this was all fake. the snorting the calling MOM like wtf? he sounds like some 26 years old with no Girl Friend, no Dad, hangs with his Mom a lot with huge glasses as bla bla bla bla bla.

This is whvt that video reminded me of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6u3jedrQQ4

This is what I was trying to say before, but it came out as a tired-person's-rage rather than how you put it.

that video was not a fake he got to be a 5 year old kid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIUCP7ZxUBY

I'm sure that is how most of the forum imagines you Cryengine people...
Edited by ToxicFantom on Dec 19, 2013 at 11:35 AM

The topic is, or can be, a valid topic of discussion about the pros and cons of moving Halo asserts to another Game engine like the Cryengine. Some people want to and some people don't and this thread if comported correctly can help people weigh the merits of both ideas.

Other threads have been closed because they were ONLY about the cryengine modding which is not part of the this forum's mission and the also got out of hand with name calling and nonsense.

As long as people stick to the subject of Halo assets and design being incorporated into the other game engine AND do not resort to childish name calling and offensive meme's it will remain open for discussion. If you have an opinion feel free to voice it in a calm and rational way if not then don't bother posting in it and the lack of interest will relegate the thread to obscurity.

^ What about the endless "screw you dennis make a cryengine section threads"? I assume those'll be locked and the creators banned, but they'll just make another account and do it again!

*edit: Oh. I just noticed that all those threads are gone.
Edited by clonecam117 on Dec 19, 2013 at 04:33 PM

They were the perfect example of childish nonsense and are meaningless; erased from existence with two clicks. Just stay on topic and things will be OK.

Dennis revive the Stay on Topic or else Spartan. That pic was awesome!

Personally, I've been working with the Blam! engine for quite some time (I think come mid march, it would have been 5 years?), and I can start to figure where the limits are, and where pushing things too far causes stablility issues (coming from the guy who works with Kirby, lol). I've seen what OS can do, and while it DOES provide an interesting boost to CE's capabilities, it doesn't match up to CryEngine.

But here what CE /does/ do.

CE is good as a starter engine for us to work in. Why? Because its /simple/ and we like it that way. Its easy to pick up and start modding and begin to learn the basics of any real game development. Hell, I learned modeling AND animation because I started working with Blam! over these years. I even learned how to make some sick looking renders from the community.

However

CryEngine is superior to our version of the Blam! engine strictly by it's capabilities and possibilities. But due to it being able to do all this weird and crazy stuff, it's a lot more complex as well. A lot of people here who complain about not being able to play it on any non gaming computer? There's a reason for that. The ORIGINAL CryEngine was messy, and Cryengine 2 (which made the first Crysis game) fixed up the messes, but it also set a graphical benchmark because that's what the engine was DESIGNED to do. If you've ever heard or read up on Cevat Yerli's remarks on the engine, he tells that the CryEngine is, and always will be, designed to push the limits of gameplay and graphics.

Also, Optimization? go look at Warface. you don't need a godly computer to go play that. The game itself is pretty scaled graphically if you know how to tone your settings the right way.


End Note: Stop saying OS >= CryEngine in any form, its not. Blam is easy to work with, and that's why we decide to use it.

I'd hate to see what would happen in three clicks then...

well they want cry engine, so lets make a map with rectangles, and circles and an AR in the middle, we will name the map cry engine. wish granted, cry engine in halo :) have fun

I think the best way to have a new and better engine is an our engine that supports Halo CE maps, but with better performance, a support to .NET C# for more complex scripts and new tools, but it needs to be simple like the Blam. That's all, I like blam and this topic is a cancer.

Crysis 1, 2 and 3 look terrible. All over-contrasted pieces of garbage. The particle effects were the only redeeming trait. You want something that can beat Cryengine?

Frostbite 3. Amazing lighting, realistic radolls, 64 players, wind turbulence (as a sniper and in a plane, also paracel storm), destroy a skyscraper with people in it and you can interact with scenery by destroying it.

Avalanche engine. Amazing lighting, decent ragdolls, wind, destruction aplenty and multiplayer with 600 people.