
HaloIsAHorribleGane
Joined: Nov 9, 2010
I'd rather play yahtzee
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 12:50 PM
Msg. 1 of 16
don't use fake bumps. ever. decent texture work will be much more effective. whoever came up with the concept of fake bumps should, in my opinion, retire their membership here for conceiving such a ridiculous concept and planting it into everybody's minds that it's a super fantastic idea. anybody on modacity will agree. all fake bumps manage to accomplish is amplifying the contrast, adding an ugly black outline around places where there should be depth, distracting from the rest of the details in the texture. almost looking cell-shaded. but if you absolutely must know, here's some tut http://www.modacity.net/forums/showthread.php?16599-Fake-Bumping/page3 Edited by HaloIsAHorribleGane on Feb 9, 2011 at 12:53 PM
|
|
|

DarkLord0912
Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Works on bigger and better things
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 12:58 PM
Msg. 2 of 16
^^Sadly he's right on some of that,im not goin to fake bump anything anymore,just use the diffuse texture and decent shaders,because honestly in my op there is no good method.
Most people fake bump the spartan as it's more detailed on his armor but that same method I find that it doesn't work well on other things or bipeds. Edited by DarkLord0912 on Feb 9, 2011 at 12:58 PM
|
|
|

anonymous_2009
Joined: Jun 13, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 01:44 PM
Msg. 3 of 16
Quote: --- Original message by: HaloIsAHorribleGanedon't use fake bumps. ever. decent texture work will be much more effective. whoever came up with the concept of fake bumps should, in my opinion, retire their membership here for conceiving such a ridiculous concept and planting it into everybody's minds that it's a super fantastic idea. anybody on modacity will agree. all fake bumps manage to accomplish is amplifying the contrast, adding an ugly black outline around places where there should be depth, distracting from the rest of the details in the texture. almost looking cell-shaded. but if you absolutely must know, here's some tut http://www.modacity.net/forums/showthread.php?16599-Fake-Bumping/page3 Edited by HaloIsAHorribleGane on Feb 9, 2011 at 12:53 PM
What gay boy said :P ^^ Edited by anonymous_2009 on Feb 9, 2011 at 07:59 PM
|
|
|

XlzQwerty1
Joined: Aug 6, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 03:42 PM
Msg. 4 of 16
But which looks better? Multipurpose normal overlays or detail normals?
|
|
|

DarkLord0912
Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Works on bigger and better things
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 04:00 PM
Msg. 5 of 16
In my honest op,I've done several ways,altering the diffuse texture or the detail slot way and to me they all look the same.
I've never done the mulitpurpose way I would like to give it a shot,but im sure it looks the same also.
|
|
|

HaloIsAHorribleGane
Joined: Nov 9, 2010
I'd rather play yahtzee
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 04:30 PM
Msg. 6 of 16
here's a way that will work just as well
1. open texture in mspaint
2. add bold-ass black lines to all the detail outlines using the pencil tool and highest thickness
3. congrats. you got fake bumps
|
|
|

Spartan_094
Joined: Jan 8, 2008
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 07:49 PM
Msg. 7 of 16
Quote: --- Original message by: wafflesQuote: --- Original message by: halo_life whats the detail method? greyscaled normal set to detail in a shader with the scaling set to one Me and gwunty found this out 2 years ago and I was the first person to release something with that method but it sucks now Also I don't use photoshoop for my "fake bumps". Photoshop isnt right. I always add the blue channel anyways to the diffuse, regardless.
|
|
|

anonymous_2009
Joined: Jun 13, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 08:13 PM
Msg. 8 of 16
*never mind* Edited by anonymous_2009 on Feb 9, 2011 at 08:13 PM
|
|
|

XlzQwerty1
Joined: Aug 6, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 09:03 PM
Msg. 9 of 16
I always think, the blue channel only makes the "shadowy" effect on the edges of the bitmaps supposedly, and IMO, it does not look good at all, not one bit. Looks like someone smeared black ink all over the edges.
|
|
|

anonymous_2009
Joined: Jun 13, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 09:28 PM
Msg. 10 of 16
Quote: --- Original message by: XlzQwerty1 I always think, the blue channel only makes the "shadowy" effect on the edges of the bitmaps supposedly, and IMO, it does not look good at all, not one bit. Looks like someone smeared black ink all over the edges. Blue channel represents normals have an angle of 90 degree's what the normal's are being baked. So in other words flat and straight out. Why would you use that channel? Edited by anonymous_2009 on Feb 9, 2011 at 09:30 PM
|
|
|

XlzQwerty1
Joined: Aug 6, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 09:33 PM
Msg. 11 of 16
Actually I don't use it at all. I use the way imbrokeru taught me
|
|
|

SlappyThePirate
Joined: Aug 24, 2009
You are irritating, I'll release nothing
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 09:54 PM
Msg. 12 of 16
In my opinion, the detail maps over the model diffuse map just aren't noticeable. Multipurpose maps are better.
|
|
|

HaloIsAHorribleGane
Joined: Nov 9, 2010
I'd rather play yahtzee
|
Posted: Feb 9, 2011 11:46 PM
Msg. 13 of 16
Quote: --- Original message by: halo_life Your post's are never helpful :/ obviously the talk of somebody who's read through every single one of my posts on these forums
|
|
|

Dennis

Joined: Jan 27, 2005
"We are made of starstuff.” ― Carl Sagan
|
Posted: Feb 10, 2011 05:24 PM
Msg. 14 of 16
|
|
|

DarkLord0912
Joined: Jan 17, 2009
Works on bigger and better things
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2011 01:10 PM
Msg. 15 of 16
Me and XlzQwerty1 helped him,good to see someone else tried though...
|
|
|

XlzQwerty1
Joined: Aug 6, 2009
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2011 03:37 PM
Msg. 16 of 16
:D
|
|
|