
Caboose117
Joined: Jul 23, 2006
Seriously guys?
|
Posted: Nov 10, 2010 01:07 PM
Msg. 36 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziamlol, i do understand why they're calling it a rail-gun, but it is still an improper name for it. It is called a Magnetic accelerator cannon, and that is final. And BTW it was related to MY creation, they were trying to NAME it for ME, lol, if you made an M9, and i decided it looked more like a USP .45, and wanted to prove that the model YOU made was NOT what YOU said, would it not aggravate you? I'm sorry, i did minorly overreact, but i had very good reason for it, seeing as i had said to be done with the rail-gun crap. oh and ehhem, http://forum.halomaps.org/index.cfm%3Fpage=topic&topicID=20813&start=1961 Rail-gun bs again (actually this is where it started.). Fair enough. Didn't realize that it hadn't just started here, and it does seem a little different there. I was just trying to start a semi-intelligent conversation about it, didn't mean to cause such a fuss. Quote: --- Original message by: Slap Happy
Another tag flushed down the toilet all because of that unsupervised-asperger-syndrome-forum-monkey? Don't give in to the monkey, give him a banana, then while he's eating it, stuff him in a burlap sack and pretend it's a pinata.
Put the DL link back up, and I'll give you the banana and the burlap sack. I might even attend your pinata party. What? Do you have any sense of tact? Do you even function in society? Where do you get off talking about people like that? Go back to where you came from, we don't need this around here. Quote: --- Original message by: anonymous_2009 okay, got new name for it to solve everything While it does solve the issues, it needs an acronym, like the BFG in Doom/Quake. Because that's not family friendly. 
|
|
|

anonymous_2009
Joined: Jun 13, 2009
|
Posted: Nov 10, 2010 01:27 PM
Msg. 37 of 178
Sarcasim *facepalm*
|
|
|

Joshflighter
Joined: May 23, 2009
Former CMT Team Co-Leader
|
Posted: Nov 10, 2010 02:13 PM
Msg. 38 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: anonymous_2009 okay, got new name for it to solve everything: BIG-MO-FOKIN-GUN!! I like and agree with this Yankee.
|
|
|

Slap Happy
Joined: Feb 2, 2009
Life ain't fair, buy a helmet.
|
Posted: Nov 10, 2010 03:38 PM
Msg. 39 of 178
FMAC - Forum Monkey Accelerator Cannon? BSPC - Burlap Sack Pinata Cannon?
/sarcasm
I like it and hope your change your mind about releasing it in spite of the drama.
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 10, 2010 04:56 PM
Msg. 40 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: anonymous_2009 okay, got new name for it to solve everything: BIG-MO-FOKIN-GUN!! lol, thank you for that :D. and about the dl link, don't expect it real soon, i'll put it back up in a few weeks, when my falcon is done too. (will likely be MUCH better)
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 04:13 AM
Msg. 41 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam
I will admit, it does look like a railgun, but that doesn't make it a railgun, now does it? As i clearly stated, i did not want to hear anymore of the bs about it, and what did i get? Someone saying that it was a model of a railgun not a mass driver. I am not overreacting, i am reacting as i said that i would, and i when i said it, planned to stick to my promise. "The Magnetic Accelerator Cannon should not be confused with the railgun, despite their superficial similarities." hmm, they are similar, but should NOT be confused with eachother, game over. I'm sorry, but now all that can be done is for you guys to hope that i feel nice at some point soon. and to Mr. Railgun, trust me, i can do more then just removing a silly DL link :P, i may not be able to fully stop people from getting it, but i can sure as hell slow them down. Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 AM Technically it is a railgun, but that's just a description. Just having rails makes it so. So, just accept it's a railgun, but nobody's preventing you from calling it a MAC or a coilgun, you have freedom of opinion. Once again, praise Bungie. I just hope 343 Studios will do better. The guy who made cola didn't intend on making it the great invention that is cola. But nevertheless, it was cola. Edited by PX173 on Nov 11, 2010 at 04:18 AM
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 07:00 AM
Msg. 42 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam
I will admit, it does look like a railgun, but that doesn't make it a railgun, now does it? As i clearly stated, i did not want to hear anymore of the bs about it, and what did i get? Someone saying that it was a model of a railgun not a mass driver. I am not overreacting, i am reacting as i said that i would, and i when i said it, planned to stick to my promise. "The Magnetic Accelerator Cannon should not be confused with the railgun, despite their superficial similarities." hmm, they are similar, but should NOT be confused with eachother, game over. I'm sorry, but now all that can be done is for you guys to hope that i feel nice at some point soon. and to Mr. Railgun, trust me, i can do more then just removing a silly DL link :P, i may not be able to fully stop people from getting it, but i can sure as hell slow them down. Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 AM Technically it is a railgun, but that's just a description. Just having rails makes it so. So, just accept it's a railgun, but nobody's preventing you from calling it a MAC or a coilgun, you have freedom of opinion. Once again, praise Bungie. I just hope 343 Studios will do better. The guy who made cola didn't intend on making it the great invention that is cola. But nevertheless, it was cola. Okay wait, if i put t2o opposite rails on the barrel of a gun, it becomes a rail-gun? your logic makes no since my friend. just because it uses a magnetic field, and has rails, doesn't make it a rail-gun, lol. Next your going to tell me that a guass hog has a rail-gun not a coil-gun? Please give me an argument that makes since :) Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 11, 2010 at 07:01 AM
|
|
|

abkarch
Joined: Mar 20, 2010
This account is old. Sorry for inappropriate posts
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 08:07 AM
Msg. 43 of 178
magnetic accelerator is the most dorky and hard to say name ever. im calling it a cannon or a rail gun. First thing i thought when i first say that was rail gun. im calling it a rail gun, get over it
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 08:43 AM
Msg. 44 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: abkarch magnetic accelerator is the most dorky and hard to say name ever. im calling it a cannon or a rail gun. First thing i thought when i first say that was rail gun. im calling it a rail gun, get over it okay, you see i dont have a problem with that, as long as your not trying to prove to me that its a rail-gun, when it isn't. Thats what was bothering me. Good try though.
|
|
|

MoooseGuy
Joined: Aug 10, 2008
I Approve This Message.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 08:58 AM
Msg. 45 of 178
Who gives a rat's ass what it's called?
|
|
|

Caboose117
Joined: Jul 23, 2006
Seriously guys?
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 11:18 AM
Msg. 46 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: gnademassica117 Spam thread is spam. Also, it IS a railgun, but why should it matter that much? That was the point a few of us were trying to make. It's either technically a railgun, or a physically impossible electromagnetic cannon. The naming issue falls on Bungie/whoever slept through their physics class. Either way, its a mass driver/mass accelerator/magnetic accelerator/linear motor.... need I go on?
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 11:21 AM
Msg. 47 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: Caboose117Quote: --- Original message by: gnademassica117 Spam thread is spam. Also, it IS a railgun, but why should it matter that much? That was the point a few of us were trying to make. It's either technically a railgun, or a physically impossible electromagnetic cannon. The naming issue falls on Bungie/whoever slept through their physics class. Either way, its a mass driver/mass accelerator/magnetic accelerator/linear motor.... need I go on? It actually, is NOT to be confused with its close relative, the Rail-gun, but whatever.
|
|
|

Caboose117
Joined: Jul 23, 2006
Seriously guys?
|
Posted: Nov 11, 2010 11:30 AM
Msg. 48 of 178
Well, I'll admit, I can be wrong, I've never played Reach, so I've not seen more than the few pictures shown of this thing. But I still haven't seen any coils to make me think otherwise.
Unless I'm mistaken also, and arcs of electricity also create viably strong EMF?
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 07:53 AM
Msg. 49 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam
I will admit, it does look like a railgun, but that doesn't make it a railgun, now does it? As i clearly stated, i did not want to hear anymore of the bs about it, and what did i get? Someone saying that it was a model of a railgun not a mass driver. I am not overreacting, i am reacting as i said that i would, and i when i said it, planned to stick to my promise. "The Magnetic Accelerator Cannon should not be confused with the railgun, despite their superficial similarities." hmm, they are similar, but should NOT be confused with eachother, game over. I'm sorry, but now all that can be done is for you guys to hope that i feel nice at some point soon. and to Mr. Railgun, trust me, i can do more then just removing a silly DL link :P, i may not be able to fully stop people from getting it, but i can sure as hell slow them down. Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 AM Technically it is a railgun, but that's just a description. Just having rails makes it so. So, just accept it's a railgun, but nobody's preventing you from calling it a MAC or a coilgun, you have freedom of opinion. Once again, praise Bungie. I just hope 343 Studios will do better. The guy who made cola didn't intend on making it the great invention that is cola. But nevertheless, it was cola. Okay wait, if i put t2o opposite rails on the barrel of a gun, it becomes a rail-gun? your logic makes no since my friend. just because it uses a magnetic field, and has rails, doesn't make it a rail-gun, lol. Next your going to tell me that a guass hog has a rail-gun not a coil-gun? Please give me an argument that makes since :) Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 11, 2010 at 07:01 AM Yep, technically it becomes a railgun. If an object fits the description of something, then it can be defined as being that something. Also, MACs are coilguns, which is an entirely different principle, which also adds to my point in the argument. Since you don't seem to give up, I will shift sides and try to prove your point. This is NOT a bottle. It's a water container.Edited by PX173 on Nov 12, 2010 at 08:08 AM
|
|
|

Cocaine
Joined: Mar 2, 2009
Can't stop napping.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 07:57 AM
Msg. 50 of 178
Derailing the thread with talk of this railgun, railly?
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 08:21 AM
Msg. 51 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam
I will admit, it does look like a railgun, but that doesn't make it a railgun, now does it? As i clearly stated, i did not want to hear anymore of the bs about it, and what did i get? Someone saying that it was a model of a railgun not a mass driver. I am not overreacting, i am reacting as i said that i would, and i when i said it, planned to stick to my promise. "The Magnetic Accelerator Cannon should not be confused with the railgun, despite their superficial similarities." hmm, they are similar, but should NOT be confused with eachother, game over. I'm sorry, but now all that can be done is for you guys to hope that i feel nice at some point soon. and to Mr. Railgun, trust me, i can do more then just removing a silly DL link :P, i may not be able to fully stop people from getting it, but i can sure as hell slow them down. Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 AM Technically it is a railgun, but that's just a description. Just having rails makes it so. So, just accept it's a railgun, but nobody's preventing you from calling it a MAC or a coilgun, you have freedom of opinion. Once again, praise Bungie. I just hope 343 Studios will do better. The guy who made cola didn't intend on making it the great invention that is cola. But nevertheless, it was cola. Okay wait, if i put t2o opposite rails on the barrel of a gun, it becomes a rail-gun? your logic makes no since my friend. just because it uses a magnetic field, and has rails, doesn't make it a rail-gun, lol. Next your going to tell me that a guass hog has a rail-gun not a coil-gun? Please give me an argument that makes since :) Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 11, 2010 at 07:01 AM Yep, technically it becomes a railgun. If an object fits the description of something, then it can be defined as being that something. Also, MACs are coilguns, which is an entirely different principle, which also adds to my point in the argument. Since you don't seem to give up, I will shift sides and try to prove your point. This is NOT a bottle. It's a water container.Edited by PX173 on Nov 12, 2010 at 08:08 AM Now wait, you just proved yourself wrong idiot, you said that MACs are coilguns right? well how can you prove that my mac isn't without contradicting yourself? now seriously, go screw yourself troll. Kthnxbai.
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:02 AM
Msg. 52 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam
I will admit, it does look like a railgun, but that doesn't make it a railgun, now does it? As i clearly stated, i did not want to hear anymore of the bs about it, and what did i get? Someone saying that it was a model of a railgun not a mass driver. I am not overreacting, i am reacting as i said that i would, and i when i said it, planned to stick to my promise. "The Magnetic Accelerator Cannon should not be confused with the railgun, despite their superficial similarities." hmm, they are similar, but should NOT be confused with eachother, game over. I'm sorry, but now all that can be done is for you guys to hope that i feel nice at some point soon. and to Mr. Railgun, trust me, i can do more then just removing a silly DL link :P, i may not be able to fully stop people from getting it, but i can sure as hell slow them down. Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 10, 2010 at 10:19 AM Technically it is a railgun, but that's just a description. Just having rails makes it so. So, just accept it's a railgun, but nobody's preventing you from calling it a MAC or a coilgun, you have freedom of opinion. Once again, praise Bungie. I just hope 343 Studios will do better. The guy who made cola didn't intend on making it the great invention that is cola. But nevertheless, it was cola. Okay wait, if i put t2o opposite rails on the barrel of a gun, it becomes a rail-gun? your logic makes no since my friend. just because it uses a magnetic field, and has rails, doesn't make it a rail-gun, lol. Next your going to tell me that a guass hog has a rail-gun not a coil-gun? Please give me an argument that makes since :) Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 11, 2010 at 07:01 AM Yep, technically it becomes a railgun. If an object fits the description of something, then it can be defined as being that something. Also, MACs are coilguns, which is an entirely different principle, which also adds to my point in the argument. Since you don't seem to give up, I will shift sides and try to prove your point. This is NOT a bottle. It's a water container.Edited by PX173 on Nov 12, 2010 at 08:08 AM Now wait, you just proved yourself wrong idiot, you said that MACs are coilguns right? well how can you prove that my mac isn't without contradicting yourself? now seriously, go screw yourself troll. Kthnxbai. I never said it was a MAC, you did.
|
|
|

MoooseGuy
Joined: Aug 10, 2008
I Approve This Message.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:06 AM
Msg. 53 of 178
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:07 AM
Msg. 54 of 178
lolwut? if your going to troll, be have a valid point, and make since, otherwise your a terrible troll. and mooseguy, thank you :P, i've freaking been trying to end this bullcrap for the past like 5 posts (probably more then that) Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 12, 2010 at 09:10 AM
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:12 AM
Msg. 55 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: MoooseGuy ^this. I know, I still won't stop, but no point in replying nor reading anyways. Wanna join us? GTFO. Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam lolwut? if your going to troll, be have a valid point, and make since, otherwise your a terrible troll. 1: When presenting something to society, it is not your opinion that matters. It's theirs. And everybody believes that it is a railgun. You are free to deny it, and never do you have to accept it, but nonetheless since the truth is what everybody believes in, it is a railgun. 2: Look at my statement on the water container. It is NOT a bottle. 3: Trolls naturally don't make any sense, they just snatch your ice cream cone and lick it.
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:17 AM
Msg. 56 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: MoooseGuy ^this. I know, I still won't stop, but no point in replying nor reading anyways. Wanna join us? GTFO. Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam lolwut? if your going to troll, be have a valid point, and make since, otherwise your a terrible troll. 1: When presenting something to society, it is not your opinion that matters. It's theirs. And everybody believes that it is a railgun. You are free to deny it, and never do you have to accept it, but nonetheless since the truth is what everybody believes in, it is a railgun. 2: Look at my statement on the water container. It is NOT a bottle. 3: Trolls naturally don't make any sense, they just snatch your ice cream cone and lick it. lolfail. So, i everyone believes in santa claus he becomes real? your getting worse, and by the way, not everyone here thinks its a railgun :P i don't, and i am someone, and i'm not the only one who doesn't. now seriously, GTFO.
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:20 AM
Msg. 57 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: MoooseGuy ^this. I know, I still won't stop, but no point in replying nor reading anyways. Wanna join us? GTFO. Quote: --- Original message by: Amazingcuziam lolwut? if your going to troll, be have a valid point, and make since, otherwise your a terrible troll. 1: When presenting something to society, it is not your opinion that matters. It's theirs. And everybody believes that it is a railgun. You are free to deny it, and never do you have to accept it, but nonetheless since the truth is what everybody believes in, it is a railgun. 2: Look at my statement on the water container. It is NOT a bottle. 3: Trolls naturally don't make any sense, they just snatch your ice cream cone and lick it. lolfail. So, i everyone believes in santa claus he becomes real? your getting worse, and by the way, not everyone here thinks its a railgun :P i don't, and i am someone, and i'm not the only one who doesn't. now seriously, GTFO. *sigh* I meant if everyone believes in a definition and connects it with a concept, object, etc., that definition becomes so for the object. My bad for being unspecific, but deliberately ignoring other points of the opposing side does not lead to triumph.
|
|
|

anonymous_2009
Joined: Jun 13, 2009
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:27 AM
Msg. 58 of 178
Stupid argument is stupid. It's getting boring now. Stop?
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:27 AM
Msg. 59 of 178
lol no, it doesn't, but what other relavent point did you have? oh and umm you lose. Now seriously, go home. (not literally, by what i said i mean GTFO NOOB) Edited by Amazingcuziam on Nov 12, 2010 at 09:39 AM
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 09:37 AM
Msg. 60 of 178
I hereby claim victory over this argument for the reason that the opposing side has failed to prove his/her point any further.
Now I'm going back to my orthodox life. I've asked some people about what they think about the argument somewhere else, but other than that, you still lose.
You say I have no valid point without presenting proof nor examples. I can present different points and not just a constant one as well as provide backup.
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 10:18 AM
Msg. 61 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: PX173 I hereby claim victory over this argument for the reason that the opposing side has failed to prove his/her point any further.
Now I'm going back to my orthodox life. I've asked some people about what they think about the argument somewhere else, but other than that, you still lose.
You say I have no valid point without presenting proof nor examples. I can present different points and not just a constant one as well as provide backup. Hey, dip, look at the picture i posted, what do you see in there? COILS, failed to prove my point eh? your the one who has failed to prove a point, you can't just claim victory idiot.
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 10:43 AM
Msg. 62 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173 I hereby claim victory over this argument for the reason that the opposing side has failed to prove his/her point any further.
Now I'm going back to my orthodox life. I've asked some people about what they think about the argument somewhere else, but other than that, you still lose.
You say I have no valid point without presenting proof nor examples. I can present different points and not just a constant one as well as provide backup. Hey, dip, look at the picture i posted, what do you see in there? COILS, failed to prove my point eh? your the one who has failed to prove a point, you can't just claim victory idiot. *coil. Singular. If you're referring to what is in the center, it couldn't possibly be used to propel the projectile along the barrel or whatever you call it. If you're referring to those things between the rails, then I'm quite sure they just guide the projectile. Also, my life includes apathy. I'm just doing this because I'm bored, it's midnight right now. 
|
|
|

PX173
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
It was worth it.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 10:57 AM
Msg. 63 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: gnademassica117
That's it. I now christen that gun as the RailMacBurger.
\Argument.
Good tag. Edited by gnademassica117 on Nov 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM Yeah no more extra pages. This is getting boring, everybody on halomaps either has a point in their arguments or just won't quit even if she knows her defense is compromised. *shrug*
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 11:08 AM
Msg. 64 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: PX173Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: PX173 I hereby claim victory over this argument for the reason that the opposing side has failed to prove his/her point any further.
Now I'm going back to my orthodox life. I've asked some people about what they think about the argument somewhere else, but other than that, you still lose.
You say I have no valid point without presenting proof nor examples. I can present different points and not just a constant one as well as provide backup. Hey, dip, look at the picture i posted, what do you see in there? COILS, failed to prove my point eh? your the one who has failed to prove a point, you can't just claim victory idiot. *coil. Singular. If you're referring to what is in the center, it couldn't possibly be used to propel the projectile along the barrel or whatever you call it. If you're referring to those things between the rails, then I'm quite sure they just guide the projectile. Also, my life includes apathy. I'm just doing this because I'm bored, it's midnight right now. lol orly? would you like to prove that it isn't enough? you cant promise me that there are not four more coils under that one that you can see in the picture.
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 11:41 AM
Msg. 65 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: assassinchief106 I hate stupid rail guns like the one you modelled. Seriously, is THIS how the argument started? what? no, it started with, "That's a railgun, quite different principal behind a mac cannon"
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 12:22 PM
Msg. 66 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: gnademassica117Quote: --- Original message by: AmazingcuziamQuote: --- Original message by: assassinchief106 I hate stupid rail guns like the one you modelled. Seriously, is THIS how the argument started? what? no, it started with, "That's a railgun, quite different principal behind a mac cannon" And why should that bother you enough to start a 3 page flame war? ... because this wasn't the first time? http://forum.halomaps.org/index.cfm%3Fpage=topic&topicID=20813&start=1961 and for the record, i started no flame war, and tried to end it multiple times.
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 01:37 PM
Msg. 67 of 178
|
|
|

Amazingcuziam
Joined: Apr 16, 2010
Sup.
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 01:45 PM
Msg. 68 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: assassinchief106 This is the second time they claimed. the second time who claimed what?
|
|
|

DA_Ender
Joined: Oct 22, 2010
(ÐÄ)€ÑÐËR †h€ GËÑØÇÏÐDÊ
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 01:49 PM
Msg. 69 of 178
Quote: --- Original message by: MoooseGuy Who gives a rat's ass what it's called? ^^^Win post of the entire thread. Sad I came in here to all this nonsense BS of people aruguing over NOTHING. This cannon will be debuting completed in my map pack. Since I'm writing the UI strings for it I WILL DECIDE WHAT IT'S CALLEDand screw all you know-it-all flamers that think you're smarter than everyone else. You think you can tell me what to do with my maps or their content? Lol. Atleast do your freaking research first. It doesn't matter what theory says it is, or what some random person says. The game series and all the backstory down to the tinniest detail is fiction. Bungie made said game series. As far as anyone SHOULD give a crap, they are gods of Halo and what they says goes. Now stop trying to justify something that isn't real and just enjoy the game. It will be called the Onager 15cm Mark/2488 1.1GJ Mass Driver Cannon. The operating principle of the mass driver is essentially the same as that of the Magnetic Accelerator Cannon: a coilgun that magnetically accelerates a package consisting of a magnetizable holder containing a payload. Official citation: http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Mass_driver Owned. Now can we finally end this arguement?? Edited by DA_Ender on Nov 12, 2010 at 02:26 PM
|
|
|

Karima Narstrom
Joined: Nov 12, 2010
Galloping along the hilltop rode the Narstrom....
|
Posted: Nov 12, 2010 02:45 PM
Msg. 70 of 178
Fine, fine work. keep up the progress! I cannot wait for the maps to release!!
~karima
|
|
|
|
 |
|